hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branch for 1.3
Date Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:13:09 GMT
Mikhail:
Any plan when to spin 1.3 RC0 ?

HBaseCon is not very far.

I was wondering if 1.3 release can be done before HBaseCon.

Cheers

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Mikhail Antonov <antonov@apache.org>
wrote:

> To me it's not really about individual big features (besides, big features
> might be hard to accommodate in a minor release), but enough good things to
> justify minor release.
>
> What we can have (unless I'm missing something):
>
> [Already done or to be further improved]
>  - HBASE-15177 - more GC-friendly allocations in RPC services
>  - HBASE-14457 - multi WAL improvements
>  - HBASE-15222 - optimizations in metrics system, some more metrics
> (like HBASE-15135, HBASE-15068)
>  - HBASE-15306, HBASE-15136 - improving call queues handling
>
> [To be reviewed?):
>  - HBASE-15181 - date based tiered compactions (?)
>  - HBASE-11290 - unlock RegionStates. There was a patch update relatively
> recently to it based on comments.
>
> [Possible?]
>  - HBASE-13557 - special handling for system tables WALs
>  - HBASE-13017 - keep table state in meta
>
> 1.2 was cut off mid-June 2015.. Should be enough time since then for a
> minor release.
>
> Mikhail
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What are the "features" in current branch-1 that is not there in 1.2? If
> > there is none, it is not worth branching yet.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > No, each 0.94.x/0.96.x/98.x was or is a minor release. :-) Sometimes
> the
> > > changes in those releases could all be considered "point" in scope or
> > > effect but not always. Further supporting this point of view, when we
> > went
> > > from 0.94 to 0.96 it was a major increment, in effect, due to 'the
> > > singularity'.
> > >
> > > Doing a new minor every month would be more like a return to past state
> > of
> > > affairs, for better or worse, in my humble opinion.
> > >
> > > > On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Is it time to branch for 1.3 ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Sean did a great job getting 1.2 out. However it was a hard
> difficult
> > > >> process that I wouldn't wish on anyone. Is it time to branch for 1.3
> > and
> > > >> start the process of stabilizing again so that we can get a monthly
> > > cadence
> > > >> for minor releases going?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Monthly cadence for minors is upping the ante. We used to be about
> > > > monthly's for point releases.
> > > >
> > > > +1 for the mighty Mikhail as RM. Sean, please UPS him the special
> robe
> > > that
> > > > he has to wear while performing his RMness duties.
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message