hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branch for 1.3
Date Thu, 28 Apr 2016 05:17:09 GMT
I saw Andy's comment. Will create a patch for trunk also and will commit
both together.

Regards
Ram

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Mikhail Antonov <antonov@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks Ram! It seems like that's fixed now (the problem when we don't
> compact often enough in TestHRegion).
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>Also need to figure out situation around HBASE-14970 - HBASE-13082
> > - HBASE-15697,
> > Regarding this - HBASE-14970 is found in both branch-1 and branch-1.3.
> The
> > patch for HBASE-15697 solves the ulimit issue with respect number of open
> > files. Once Andrew verifies it we can commit the patch and you can have
> > that in the branch-1.3 release IMHO.
> >
> > Thanks Mikhail for the heads up.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ram
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Mikhail Antonov <antonov@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I think it's time to bring up this thread again. Let's see where we
> > > are.
> > >
> > > So, outstanding -
> > >
> > > Significant bugs (looked through jira filters):
> > >  - Several bugfixes/improvements in HBase client, often related to
> > > rpc/retries, went in recently or about to go in.
> > >   * HBASE-15645, when we don't use rpc timeouts properly, went in
> > (pending
> > > addendum for nits)
> > >   * HBASE-15658, when we unnecessarily clear MetaCache on retries, went
> > in
> > > on 1.3+,
> > >      probably should go in 1.2 as well, see discussion there.
> > >  * HBASE-15593, and HBASE-15615 - those should be addressed soon I
> guess
> > >
> > >  - Bucket cache fixes improvements, HBASE-15240 and subtasks, would be
> > good
> > > to pull in as much as possible.
> > >  - HBASE-15703, bug in deadline rpc scheduler, I'd need to fix it
> before
> > > the release
> > >
> > > Any other very-nice-to-get-in fixes we want?
> > >
> > > Also need to figure out situation around HBASE-14970 - HBASE-13082
> > > - HBASE-15697,
> > > I kind of lost track what was committed/reverted/re-aplied on which
> > branch.
> > > @Andrew, Stack, Ram
> > >
> > > Features:
> > >    * Date-tiered compactions. I'm looking at umbrella jira for d-t
> > > compactions, HBASE-15339 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15339>
> > > ,
> > >       looks like there's one big item left on the list (HBASE-15454,
> > > archive StoreFile older than max age),
> > >       and it's being actively worked on / reviewed, and another one -
> > > documentation task, so I assume it's all good
> > >       and we get all date-tiers compactions improvements for 1.3.
> > >   * Spark connector. Haven't seen much activity on it lately. Sean -
> what
> > > do you think about HBASE-14160?
> > >      I'm inclined to push it to 1.4 (or whatever next release will be)
> if
> > > there're no takers at this point.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Mikhail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > bq. There are several patches
> > > >
> > > > Let us know the JIRA numbers.
> > > > I can help with reviewing if needed.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
> olorinbant@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Last time I've tried to run 1.3 builds there were issues with
> > balancer,
> > > > > which are fixed now. There are several patches I definitely would
> > like
> > > to
> > > > > pull in, other than that I feel we are pretty close. I'll start
> > > spinning
> > > > > internal builds in a few days and if things look good will start
> > > > preparing
> > > > > RC's next week or so.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess we are getting to feature-complete state, I'll walk through
> > the
> > > > > jiras and send detailed email over weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > Mikhail
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Apr 22, 2016, at 8:13 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mikhail:
> > > > > > Any plan when to spin 1.3 RC0 ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HBaseCon is not very far.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was wondering if 1.3 release can be done before HBaseCon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
> > > antonov@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> To me it's not really about individual big features (besides,
> big
> > > > > features
> > > > > >> might be hard to accommodate in a minor release), but enough
> good
> > > > > things to
> > > > > >> justify minor release.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> What we can have (unless I'm missing something):
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [Already done or to be further improved]
> > > > > >> - HBASE-15177 - more GC-friendly allocations in RPC services
> > > > > >> - HBASE-14457 - multi WAL improvements
> > > > > >> - HBASE-15222 - optimizations in metrics system, some more
> metrics
> > > > > >> (like HBASE-15135, HBASE-15068)
> > > > > >> - HBASE-15306, HBASE-15136 - improving call queues handling
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [To be reviewed?):
> > > > > >> - HBASE-15181 - date based tiered compactions (?)
> > > > > >> - HBASE-11290 - unlock RegionStates. There was a patch update
> > > > relatively
> > > > > >> recently to it based on comments.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [Possible?]
> > > > > >> - HBASE-13557 - special handling for system tables WALs
> > > > > >> - HBASE-13017 - keep table state in meta
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 1.2 was cut off mid-June 2015.. Should be enough time since
then
> > > for a
> > > > > >> minor release.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Mikhail
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Enis Söztutar <
> > enis.soz@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> What are the "features" in current branch-1 that is
not there
> in
> > > 1.2?
> > > > > If
> > > > > >>> there is none, it is not worth branching yet.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Enis
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > > > >> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> No, each 0.94.x/0.96.x/98.x was or is a minor release.
:-)
> > > Sometimes
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >>>> changes in those releases could all be considered
"point" in
> > scope
> > > > or
> > > > > >>>> effect but not always. Further supporting this point
of view,
> > when
> > > > we
> > > > > >>> went
> > > > > >>>> from 0.94 to 0.96 it was a major increment, in effect,
due to
> > 'the
> > > > > >>>> singularity'.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Doing a new minor every month would be more like
a return to
> > past
> > > > > state
> > > > > >>> of
> > > > > >>>> affairs, for better or worse, in my humble opinion.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Elliott
Clark <
> > > > eclark@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Is it time to branch for 1.3 ?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Sean did a great job getting 1.2 out. However
it was a hard
> > > > > >> difficult
> > > > > >>>>>> process that I wouldn't wish on anyone.
Is it time to branch
> > for
> > > > 1.3
> > > > > >>> and
> > > > > >>>>>> start the process of stabilizing again so
that we can get a
> > > > monthly
> > > > > >>>> cadence
> > > > > >>>>>> for minor releases going?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Monthly cadence for minors is upping the ante.
We used to be
> > > about
> > > > > >>>>> monthly's for point releases.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> +1 for the mighty Mikhail as RM. Sean, please
UPS him the
> > special
> > > > > >> robe
> > > > > >>>> that
> > > > > >>>>> he has to wear while performing his RMness duties.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> St.Ack
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message