Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82FE2189D9 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40855 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2016 20:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 40771 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2016 20:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 40760 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2016 20:26:39 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 20:26:39 +0000 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 3132C1A05A7 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j186so258207lfg.2 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 12:26:39 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK9zQTEG4Nl8vIHPa71VkrUli4F0CkpYeNfJ0hzTVlf90jaSZnODC6MOJZK6qcv24JXGaBPGR818dctfQ== X-Received: by 10.25.154.65 with SMTP id c62mr11791050lfe.54.1456950397685; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 12:26:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.204.234 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:26:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:26:17 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: /bin/ls permission issue on precommit tests To: dev@yetus.apache.org Cc: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The conversation around the demand for such a service should come from who? PMCs that want to use Yetus, I think? -Sean On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Speaking with my infra hat on - > > I'd like to see us end up going in that direction. But yeah, it'll need > committed resources from infra, meaning cycles from paid infra staff and > those staff being able to handle the work without needing to resort to > volunteer assistance for day to day activities. Starting a discussion with > infra about the possibility would be a good idea. > > A. > On Mar 2, 2016 12:00, "Sean Busbey" wrote: > >> Another option would be to request that infra@asf provide "yetus based >> precommit testing" as an SLA governed service. Then they could >> maintain configuration management of running the tests with known good >> versions and rolling them out across projects. >> >> AFAIK, the backlog on infra is pretty severe though, so requests are >> likely to get backlogged if they don't come with a volunteer. >> >>