hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [NOTICE] defunct branch clean up
Date Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:51:35 GMT
We should not accumulate feature branches indefinitely as it makes the repo
increasingly unwieldy.

AFAICT, the branch "hbase-6721" is not related to the actual patch(es) that
went in to master for the HBASE-6721 implementation. It will not help with
an accurate backport.

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> For HBASE-6721, is there definitive decision not to backport to branch-1 ?
>
> If not, keeping history for its branch is very helpful for backport.
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > What is our policy for deleting feature branches? For example,
> HBASE-10070,
> > HBASE-6721, etc are all committed, so we do not need the branches. We
> > should only keep them around if we think that keeping history is
> important
> > (which I am not so sure).
> >
> > Enis
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to clean out some of our defunct git branches.
> > >
> > > The current list I'm proposing is in JIRA:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15006
> > >
> > >
> > > If you have a branch you're keeping around and haven't touched in some
> > > time, please take a look and make sure I'm not including it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Similarly, if you know you had a feature branch at some point in the
> > > distant past and you're not interested in using it any more, please
> take
> > a
> > > look and make sure it's listed.
> > > --
> > > busbey
> > >
> >
>



-- 
busbey

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message