Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALvzVW2s_c0nx9wUQJFQO4AhnkjHmqU5fSBLEkjh6hHLGHGT+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANZa=GttfvXe5ff99azOOh9HYD=pqDf+sEYX5=bbBO831sRoqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <07036AC6-073E-46D8-9525-5D14175EB916@gmail.com>
 <CALvzVW3CWw=E-z0tpFXfhO3ELiS0rZwp_gRiVfb0mTMyAJmphw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_DBnm64o6Sp7vp4apaerPXd=Okp6aEEy_A1jUUioQ2LPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_AJXrDvJV9oDW60WfJC53hYr17URY2QmPBOcsAXbT6jUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvzVW2s_c0nx9wUQJFQO4AhnkjHmqU5fSBLEkjh6hHLGHGT+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:25:13 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_CknVUfZXt3Aid_0V3VHJ8AQ3Qh69f4FKpF-W3RSn2Obw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Backporting to active branches
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c320706e14e4052b845bd9

--001a11c320706e14e4052b845bd9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I would assert that to be because less and less things are applying now.

=E2=80=8BI'm sure that's true as well (smile)
=E2=80=8B


On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > later versions of 0.98 are more stable
>
>
> I would assert that to be because less and less things are applying now.
>
> Every time we have tried a new patch version of 1.0 ( We haven't really
> tried any 1.1 since we've been on 1.2) there were new issues. I have yet =
to
> try a new patch version that didn't have the same issues I would associat=
e
> with a minor version.
>


--=20
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

--001a11c320706e14e4052b845bd9--