hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branch for 1.3
Date Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:53:53 GMT
I'm starting a push at work to get us up on 1.2. Assuming that happens later this year I think
that will be the end of my close attention to 0.98. 

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> In the meantime those of us running HBase in production would benefit from
>> fairly frequent minor releases.
> 
> +1. Having to look back to 0.98 to get some new feature is problematic.
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I disagree. We have agreed that 2.0 will have a new assignement manager.
>>> There's a lot of work that has been done on getting that in, so far there
>>> are no benefits to the end user from all that work. We should stick with
>>> the plan and release 2.0 when it's ready.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks for Mikhail for taking the 1.3 RM role.  Looks like we have a
>> lot
>>> of
>>>> new things in 1.3 release.
>>>> 
>>>> Based on the experience of 1.1 and 1.2 release, it takes a lot of
>> efforts
>>>> to get a stable minor release out.  From this, I have my own 2-cents on
>>> 1.4
>>>> release.  The plan is to have 2.0 release during summer time of this
>> year
>>>> (yeah, *this year).  * Given the limited time and resource,  after 1.3
>>>> release, instead of spending effort on 1.4 release, the community
>> should
>>>> focus on stabilizing master (or branch-2, not exist as of now) branch
>> and
>>>> make 2.0 release a priority.  2.0 release would bring more values to
>>>> customer  & move towards maturity of HBASE product.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Stephen
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Created an umbrella jira for 1.3 release - HBASE-15341
>>>>> 
>>>>> So it looks like we may have 1.4 release before 2.0 is out? I tried
>> to
>>>> add
>>>>> 1.4 version in jira so we can keep it in branch-1 poms but I
>> couldn't -
>>>>> looks like I don't have permissions?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Mikhail
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The guy we had looking at streaming replication moved on and
>> there's
>>> no
>>>>>> immediate plans to take on the work, FWIW
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Matteo Bertozzi <
>>>>> theo.bertozzi@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was shooting for summer for hbase 2.0, the main problem is
that
>>>> there
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> still no code for the new AM or for fs changes, which are the
two
>>>> that
>>>>>> may
>>>>>>> impact compatibility (working slowly on that). Streaming
>>> replication
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> others seems compatible enough but no code there too.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Matteo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
>>>> olorinbant@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting
>>>>>> decisions
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which is itself
>>>> separate
>>>>>>>> thread).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Mikhail
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey <
>>> busbey@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
>>>>>> olorinbant@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> - "Shouldn't we rather try to get 2.0 release out
and have
>>>> mobs
>>>>>>>> there".
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> So how far do we feel 2.0 release is?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2.0 readiness probably deserves its own [DISCUSS] thread,
but
>>>> we're
>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>> past a year since the HBase 1.0.0 release, so I hope
it's
>> soon.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sean
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Michael Antonov
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   - Andy
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>>>> Hein
>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Michael Antonov
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>   - Andy
>> 
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>> 

Mime
View raw message