hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MOB in branch-1? (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Merge branch hbase-11339 HBase MOB to trunk)
Date Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:11:35 GMT
I am interested in hearing about user experience with MOB feature as well.

In my opinion, this feature is a nice addition to branch-1.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> +user@
>
> Is there anyone using the MOB feature in trunk for anything who can comment
> on how well it's been working out? Intel folks maybe?
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > The last time MOB on branch-1 came up, folks were concerned that it
> > wasn't stable enough in master yet. Is that still the case?
> >
> > Can we get a [DISCUSS] flagged thread to see what, if anything, folks
> > would like to see gate inclusion in branch-1?
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > > +1 to 1.2 being feature complete corrently.  There has already been a
> > > release candidate and folks are burning down the blockers currently to
> > prep
> > > for the next RC.
> > >
> > > I like the idea of mob and sparkonhbase for 1.3.  I'm more comfortable
> > with
> > > sparkonhbase -- it is a new module and thus not as invasive.
> > >
> > > Jon.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Pretty sure Sean expressed 1.2 is feature complete and I'd support
> that.
> > >> Can we wait for 1.3 for MOB ? Can look at Spark connector then too.
> > >>
> > >> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Looks like 1.2.0 RC is in near future.
> > >> >
> > >> > I wonder if it is time to revive this thread (due to customer
> > interest).
> > >> >
> > >> > As far as I can tell, the Mob related tests have been passing in the
> > >> recent
> > >> > past.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have
> that
> > >> >> discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Jiang <
> > syuanjiangdev@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Actually, it is actively changing in master branch on MOB
feature
> > made
> > >> me
> > >> >>> think about: if we ever want to port MOB feature to branch-1,
now
> > is a
> > >> >> good
> > >> >>> time.  We can commit changes in both branches; otherwise,
we
> > probably
> > >> >> would
> > >> >>> miss some commits when we port MOB to branch-1 in a late time.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I am more thinking about 1.3 release (certainly not 1.2),
which we
> > >> still
> > >> >>> have some time to stabilize and allow interesting party to
play
> with
> > >> the
> > >> >>> feature and give feedback.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Thanks
> > >> >>> Stephen
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> PS. given the features we discussed in 2.0.0 in the last community
> > >> >> meeting,
> > >> >>> I think it would not release earlier than 1.3 :-), unless
we
> > >> >> intentionally
> > >> >>> not find a release manager for 1.3.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sean Busbey <
> busbey@cloudera.com>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread
on
> > target
> > >> >>>> dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark <
> eclark@apache.org
> > >
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>> I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work
towards a
> > faster
> > >> >>>> 2.0.0.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has
a bunch of
> flakey
> > >> >>> tests
> > >> >>>>>> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled
them till
> > >> >> someone
> > >> >>>> has
> > >> >>>>>> time to look at them. There is also a load of
duplicated code
> > that
> > >> >> is
> > >> >>>> being
> > >> >>>>>> cleaned up (Matteo).
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Are there users who'd like it backported?
> > >> >>>>>> St.Ack
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang
<
> > >> >>>> syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch.
 I saw bug fixes
> > >> >> happening
> > >> >>>> in
> > >> >>>>>>> master branch.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> I just wonder whether there is a plan to put
MOB in
> branch-1.  I
> > >> >> am
> > >> >>>>>> afraid
> > >> >>>>>>> if we don't do it now, it would be harder
in the future to
> back
> > >> >> port
> > >> >>>> if
> > >> >>>>>> we
> > >> >>>>>>> decide to do it in a late time.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Thanks
> > >> >>>>>>> Stephen
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell
<
> > >> >>> apurtell@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Jon.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> When I'm back in the office I'll check
out master and have a
> > >> >> look
> > >> >>>> into
> > >> >>>>>>> any
> > >> >>>>>>>> locally repeatable test failures. Anyway
in my opinion at
> this
> > >> >>>> point it
> > >> >>>>>>>> would make the most sense for us to keep
the MOB changes in
> on
> > >> >>>> master
> > >> >>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>> deal with any fallout in follow on issues.
I think all who
> > voted
> > >> >>> +1
> > >> >>>> for
> > >> >>>>>>>> this change were aware that large changes
like this can have
> a
> > >> >>>>>>> temporarily
> > >> >>>>>>>> destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB
devs are around to
> > help
> > >> >>>> clean
> > >> >>>>>>> up,
> > >> >>>>>>>> we should be good!
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan
Hsieh <
> > >> >> jon@cloudera.com
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> I had two clean full builds/unit test
on my internal setup
> and
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>>>>>> latest
> > >> >>>>>>>>> build went back to ~4325 total tests
and failures on
> Procedure
> > >> >>>> relate
> > >> >>>>>>>> tests
> > >> >>>>>>>>> cases.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> I don't think mob is responsible for
these failures.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Jon.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan
Hsieh <
> > >> >>> jon@cloudera.com
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Although the the precommit buiid
passed, and the
> compilation
> > >> >>> and
> > >> >>>>>> mob
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> testing I ran after before the
merge was commited passed,
> It
> > >> >>>> looks
> > >> >>>>>>> like
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> the first full build after the
merge [1] failed.  It looked
> > >> >>> like
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> something hung along the way,
and that most of the previous
> > >> >>>> builds
> > >> >>>>>>> had
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> failed for various reasons. :(
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> I kicked it off again have it
do another try.  If it is mob
> > >> >>>> related
> > >> >>>>>>>> we'll
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> take hunt it down and take care
of it.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Jon.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM,
Jonathan Hsieh <
> > >> >>>> jon@cloudera.com>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I've merged the code in to
master.  Thanks for all the
> hard
> > >> >>>> work
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng and thanks to all
who have been involved with
> > >> >>>> reviews,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> discussion, and voting!
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Jon
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45
AM, Jingcheng Du <
> > >> >>>>>>>> jingcheng.du@intel.com>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote passes with 8
+1s and no -1. Thanks all for
> > >> >>> guiding,
> > >> >>>>>>> helping
> > >> >>>>>>>>> and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> voting!
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will work on the merge
activities and will let guys
> > >> >> know
> > >> >>>> about
> > >> >>>>>>> the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> detailed plan for merge
time.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And thanks Jon for helping
merge this branch to trunk!
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the HBase Developer
mailing list archive at
> > >> >>>> Nabble.com.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software
Engineer, Cloudera
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer,
Cloudera
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > >> >>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer,
Cloudera
> > >> >>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> --
> > >> >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>   - Andy
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their
worth by hitting back.
> -
> > >> >>> Piet
> > >> >>>>>> Hein
> > >> >>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> --
> > >> >>>> Sean
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Best regards,
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   - Andy
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
Piet
> > Hein
> > >> >> (via Tom White)
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message