hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branch for 1.3
Date Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:00:41 GMT
Yeah, I also think that the time for 2.0 will come once new assignment
manager and fs layout changes are completed and stabilized. Wouldn't try to
estimate, but seems like 1.4 could well fit in the schedule before that.

-Mikhail

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> In the meantime those of us running HBase in production would benefit from
>> fairly frequent minor releases.
>>
>
> +1. Having to look back to 0.98 to get some new feature is problematic.
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I disagree. We have agreed that 2.0 will have a new assignement manager.
>> > There's a lot of work that has been done on getting that in, so far
>> there
>> > are no benefits to the end user from all that work. We should stick with
>> > the plan and release 2.0 when it's ready.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiangdev@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks for Mikhail for taking the 1.3 RM role.  Looks like we have a
>> lot
>> > of
>> > > new things in 1.3 release.
>> > >
>> > > Based on the experience of 1.1 and 1.2 release, it takes a lot of
>> efforts
>> > > to get a stable minor release out.  From this, I have my own 2-cents
>> on
>> > 1.4
>> > > release.  The plan is to have 2.0 release during summer time of this
>> year
>> > > (yeah, *this year).  * Given the limited time and resource,  after 1.3
>> > > release, instead of spending effort on 1.4 release, the community
>> should
>> > > focus on stabilizing master (or branch-2, not exist as of now) branch
>> and
>> > > make 2.0 release a priority.  2.0 release would bring more values to
>> > > customer  & move towards maturity of HBASE product.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Stephen
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov <
>> olorinbant@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Created an umbrella jira for 1.3 release - HBASE-15341
>> > > >
>> > > > So it looks like we may have 1.4 release before 2.0 is out? I tried
>> to
>> > > add
>> > > > 1.4 version in jira so we can keep it in branch-1 poms but I
>> couldn't -
>> > > > looks like I don't have permissions?
>> > > >
>> > > > -Mikhail
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <
>> apurtell@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > The guy we had looking at streaming replication moved on and
>> there's
>> > no
>> > > > > immediate plans to take on the work, FWIW
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Matteo Bertozzi <
>> > > > theo.bertozzi@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I was shooting for summer for hbase 2.0, the main problem
is
>> that
>> > > there
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > still no code for the new AM or for fs changes, which are
the
>> two
>> > > that
>> > > > > may
>> > > > > > impact compatibility (working slowly on that). Streaming
>> > replication
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > others seems compatible enough but no code there too.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Matteo
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
>> > > olorinbant@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something
affecting
>> > > > > decisions
>> > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which
is itself
>> > > separate
>> > > > > > > thread).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -Mikhail
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey <
>> > busbey@cloudera.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail Antonov
<
>> > > > > olorinbant@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >  - "Shouldn't we rather try to get 2.0 release
out and
>> have
>> > > mobs
>> > > > > > > there".
>> > > > > > > > -
>> > > > > > > > > So how far do we feel 2.0 release is?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2.0 readiness probably deserves its own [DISCUSS]
thread,
>> but
>> > > we're
>> > > > > now
>> > > > > > > > past a year since the HBase 1.0.0 release, so
I hope it's
>> soon.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > > Sean
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Michael Antonov
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > >
>> > > > >    - Andy
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
-
>> Piet
>> > > Hein
>> > > > > (via Tom White)
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Michael Antonov
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Michael Antonov

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message