hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Branch for 1.3
Date Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:52:18 GMT
The guy we had looking at streaming replication moved on and there's no
immediate plans to take on the work, FWIW

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Matteo Bertozzi <theo.bertozzi@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I was shooting for summer for hbase 2.0, the main problem is that there is
> still no code for the new AM or for fs changes, which are the two that may
> impact compatibility (working slowly on that). Streaming replication and
> others seems compatible enough but no code there too.
>
> Matteo
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting decisions
> on
> > whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which is itself separate
> > thread).
> >
> > -Mikhail
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >  - "Shouldn't we rather try to get 2.0 release out and have mobs
> > there".
> > > -
> > > > So how far do we feel 2.0 release is?
> > > >
> > >
> > > 2.0 readiness probably deserves its own [DISCUSS] thread, but we're now
> > > past a year since the HBase 1.0.0 release, so I hope it's soon.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Michael Antonov
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message