hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Re: Branch for 1.3
Date Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:11:48 GMT
I had previously volunteered to RM a 1.3 when it came around but I believe
we should pass the hat around as much as possible. If you want to take it
Mikhail, I say +1 to that.


On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Mikhail Antonov <antonov@apache.org> wrote:

> Updating to the next minor release is supposed to be pretty straightforward
> and low-risky,
> so I don't think I see justification/value to maintain them for long time.
>
> (if there's no RM for 1.3 yet I can volunteer to)
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > bq.  will we also be deprecating minor releases faster?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Is it time to branch for 1.3 ?
> > > >
> > > > Sean did a great job getting 1.2 out. However it was a hard difficult
> > > > process that I wouldn't wish on anyone. Is it time to branch for 1.3
> > and
> > > > start the process of stabilizing again so that we can get a monthly
> > > cadence
> > > > for minor releases going?
> > >
> > > Are we aiming for a monthly cadence on minor releases? That's going to
> > > burn through RMs pretty fast. Or will we also be deprecating minor
> > > releases faster?
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message