hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: MOB in branch-1? (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Merge branch hbase-11339 HBase MOB to trunk)
Date Wed, 10 Feb 2016 21:45:15 GMT
+user@

Is there anyone using the MOB feature in trunk for anything who can comment
on how well it's been working out? Intel folks maybe?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:

> The last time MOB on branch-1 came up, folks were concerned that it
> wasn't stable enough in master yet. Is that still the case?
>
> Can we get a [DISCUSS] flagged thread to see what, if anything, folks
> would like to see gate inclusion in branch-1?
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > +1 to 1.2 being feature complete corrently.  There has already been a
> > release candidate and folks are burning down the blockers currently to
> prep
> > for the next RC.
> >
> > I like the idea of mob and sparkonhbase for 1.3.  I'm more comfortable
> with
> > sparkonhbase -- it is a new module and thus not as invasive.
> >
> > Jon.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Pretty sure Sean expressed 1.2 is feature complete and I'd support that.
> >> Can we wait for 1.3 for MOB ? Can look at Spark connector then too.
> >>
> >> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Looks like 1.2.0 RC is in near future.
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if it is time to revive this thread (due to customer
> interest).
> >> >
> >> > As far as I can tell, the Mob related tests have been passing in the
> >> recent
> >> > past.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have that
> >> >> discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Jiang <
> syuanjiangdev@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Actually, it is actively changing in master branch on MOB feature
> made
> >> me
> >> >>> think about: if we ever want to port MOB feature to branch-1, now
> is a
> >> >> good
> >> >>> time.  We can commit changes in both branches; otherwise, we
> probably
> >> >> would
> >> >>> miss some commits when we port MOB to branch-1 in a late time.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I am more thinking about 1.3 release (certainly not 1.2), which
we
> >> still
> >> >>> have some time to stabilize and allow interesting party to play
with
> >> the
> >> >>> feature and give feedback.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks
> >> >>> Stephen
> >> >>>
> >> >>> PS. given the features we discussed in 2.0.0 in the last community
> >> >> meeting,
> >> >>> I think it would not release earlier than 1.3 :-), unless we
> >> >> intentionally
> >> >>> not find a release manager for 1.3.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread
on
> target
> >> >>>> dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>>> I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work towards
a
> faster
> >> >>>> 2.0.0.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch
of flakey
> >> >>> tests
> >> >>>>>> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled
them till
> >> >> someone
> >> >>>> has
> >> >>>>>> time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated
code
> that
> >> >> is
> >> >>>> being
> >> >>>>>> cleaned up (Matteo).
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Are there users who'd like it backported?
> >> >>>>>> St.Ack
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang <
> >> >>>> syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch.  I saw
bug fixes
> >> >> happening
> >> >>>> in
> >> >>>>>>> master branch.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB
in branch-1.  I
> >> >> am
> >> >>>>>> afraid
> >> >>>>>>> if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the
future to back
> >> >> port
> >> >>>> if
> >> >>>>>> we
> >> >>>>>>> decide to do it in a late time.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >> >>>>>>> Stephen
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell
<
> >> >>> apurtell@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Jon.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> When I'm back in the office I'll check out
master and have a
> >> >> look
> >> >>>> into
> >> >>>>>>> any
> >> >>>>>>>> locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in
my opinion at this
> >> >>>> point it
> >> >>>>>>>> would make the most sense for us to keep the
MOB changes in on
> >> >>>> master
> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>> deal with any fallout in follow on issues.
I think all who
> voted
> >> >>> +1
> >> >>>> for
> >> >>>>>>>> this change were aware that large changes like
this can have a
> >> >>>>>>> temporarily
> >> >>>>>>>> destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs
are around to
> help
> >> >>>> clean
> >> >>>>>>> up,
> >> >>>>>>>> we should be good!
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh
<
> >> >> jon@cloudera.com
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> I had two clean full builds/unit test on
my internal setup and
> >> >>> the
> >> >>>>>>> latest
> >> >>>>>>>>> build went back to ~4325 total tests and
failures on Procedure
> >> >>>> relate
> >> >>>>>>>> tests
> >> >>>>>>>>> cases.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> I don't think mob is responsible for these
failures.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Jon.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan
Hsieh <
> >> >>> jon@cloudera.com
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Although the the precommit buiid passed,
and the compilation
> >> >>> and
> >> >>>>>> mob
> >> >>>>>>>>>> testing I ran after before the merge
was commited passed, It
> >> >>>> looks
> >> >>>>>>> like
> >> >>>>>>>>>> the first full build after the merge
[1] failed.  It looked
> >> >>> like
> >> >>>>>>>>>> something hung along the way, and that
most of the previous
> >> >>>> builds
> >> >>>>>>> had
> >> >>>>>>>>>> failed for various reasons. :(
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> I kicked it off again have it do another
try.  If it is mob
> >> >>>> related
> >> >>>>>>>> we'll
> >> >>>>>>>>>> take hunt it down and take care of
it.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Jon.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan
Hsieh <
> >> >>>> jon@cloudera.com>
> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I've merged the code in to master.
 Thanks for all the hard
> >> >>>> work
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng and thanks to all who
have been involved with
> >> >>>> reviews,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> discussion, and voting!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Jon
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM,
Jingcheng Du <
> >> >>>>>>>> jingcheng.du@intel.com>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote passes with 8 +1s
and no -1. Thanks all for
> >> >>> guiding,
> >> >>>>>>> helping
> >> >>>>>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> voting!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will work on the merge activities
and will let guys
> >> >> know
> >> >>>> about
> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> detailed plan for merge time.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And thanks Jon for helping
merge this branch to trunk!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the HBase Developer
mailing list archive at
> >> >>>> Nabble.com.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer,
Cloudera
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >> >>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer,
Cloudera
> >> >>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> >> >>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer,
Cloudera
> >> >>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>   - Andy
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth
by hitting back. -
> >> >>> Piet
> >> >>>>>> Hein
> >> >>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Sean
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Best regards,
> >> >>
> >> >>   - Andy
> >> >>
> >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >> >> (via Tom White)
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message