hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC2
Date Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:16:27 GMT
Same here. I have started with RC2 but can mostly carry findings to RC3 given only one additional
change. 

> On Feb 12, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> -1 until the dataloss is fixed.
> 
> But assuming that's fixed I would be good for a short vote cycle for the
> next RC.
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, 张铎 <palomino219@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> HBASE-15252 is fixed :).
>> 
>> 2016-02-12 14:00 GMT+08:00 Stack <stack@duboce.net>:
>> 
>>> -1
>>> 
>>> The dataloss issue was just discovered. I think now we know of it, even
>>> though the incidence is rare, would be best to respin the RC.
>>> 
>>> You the man Sean,
>>> St.Ack
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Sean Busbey <sean.busbey@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2016 18:33, "张铎" <palomino219@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Should we include HBASE-15252? It is a data loss issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's marked major (though perhaps that's off since it's dataloss, even
>>> if
>>>>> rare). More importantly it's been present in prior releases for some
>>> time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Blocking 1.2.0 would put pressure on getting a solution faster, I
>> think.
>>>>> Additionally, letting the fix wait for 1.2.1 will give me a good
>>> incentive
>>>>> to keep the path releases on schedule. ;)
>>>>> 
>>>>> My 2¢. Happy to roll another RC if folks see it otherwise.
>>>> 
>>>> Dataloss. I think we should roll a new RC with short voting timeframe.
>>>> St.Ack
>> 

Mime
View raw message