Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEBC5180CD for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21257 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2016 18:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 21157 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2016 18:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 21144 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2016 18:54:26 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:54:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 588AAC1E72 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:54:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.98 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cT_08cHhnMTZ for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8579C429C2 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id y184so299631610lfc.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:54:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VU+oDmdu9mEF1SlN2pp5kE2+HFZG3P4aWMCr4sj1Xvo=; b=wMhwLFJtkdGLJ6JcFSuhZF+gHfkV9M+jCLGiqQBoJI2DiCi89Ik2JwReiJpVAzanmS WB1H9zygE+PQZeLWkEQ6tDhYuNCS2rCX/UBKiiZut/Ph4MuVjGYOUuM5170DofkrdV8A dJEjsjy2avcACqW523g8dDuEYJYqTkjzgLaBceEIr7pRgQbhufZnXdf0hXvPXIVUO9EC SGfcS5ANXu1cHxHhWpu7P21NhgnaIqEJBQfk99hCo1/BkL539bXBhL7zHTloSA6Hh29F agTKQy75ch2MNpeXrN/TGCgs8Xdmmg8d+IEBiPxdNKYStn88k/8Q8/IXPULOZMq/ESTg tnHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VU+oDmdu9mEF1SlN2pp5kE2+HFZG3P4aWMCr4sj1Xvo=; b=DCtxh9IPdyQi5OoP/GHhYGhMjdqp6vHu5+FUx2+j8+IVdiImePEMf3AWbFknxkXmAi gNCPyiKIfR5+jqkivwM15qcFMHj/34rckAkFp9uWYV4uCOX9lGAwzO1FOrIs/aZb5FSu vILkze6YPoy+STshufJlWZKS/1lkp444Ci/AMsd2dyr5q11upeBCbKXlsVjqAeEdpCOL OnmLMRI5MMHkjekvlO4nVTiL5sCwp9N7RpDix3+lZHUsq3fYRZQhtfS+9piQIpZJP5TF uOOqDNIo6SyFXH36/BbHXrDIPQGIxltSD5/uyeFOrAaka84RmP5fYJ/0EHmVp2aOWiXJ 8Aiw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm+vg1dq15fHW3HbD+UIwPzFiArlcuaR3nYJVVr4j213V4eSNI4XQYTZuHapMRqDmtp4Mfmmrl3f7OHuBc92n5Z0DONTkp0l3mWGnNgxRjmrLvBK48= X-Received: by 10.25.86.211 with SMTP id k202mr14080323lfb.69.1452020059289; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:54:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.76.11 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:53:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:53:59 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: truncated checkstyle output To: dev Cc: stack Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141ef26d75aee05289ac38b --001a1141ef26d75aee05289ac38b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm hoping to have a first pass of transitioning to yetus up later this week, so maybe this issue will be obviated? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Apekshit Sharma wrote: > Stack was facing same issue yesterday with > https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/17118. I think he > tried > re-running it. Don't know after that. > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Hi, > > I was looking at checkstyle warnings for one of my patches. > > I noticed that both trunkCheckstyle.xml and patchCheckstyle.xml were > > truncated, resulting in bad-formed xml files. > > > > I downloaded trunkCheckstyle.xml from another QA run (not for my patch) > and > > observed truncated xml: > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/17120/artifact/patchprocess/ > > > > Here was the tail of trunkCheckstyle.xml : > > > > > > > > source="com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.javadoc.NonEmptyAtclauseDescriptionCheck"/> > > > > > > > > name="/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/hbase/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/security/access/Permission.java"> > > > > > Has anyone else noticed similar issue ? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > > Regards > > Apekshit Sharma | Software Engineer, Cloudera | Palo Alto, California | > 650-963-6311 > -- Sean --001a1141ef26d75aee05289ac38b--