Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BF9F18BFC for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92330 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2016 17:30:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 92243 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2016 17:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 92231 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2016 17:30:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EB1FF180539 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqbn0aoRCDNK for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 33EA820D0D for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q21so27156286iod.0 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:30:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=BEfcvqvWnV+tPAZPtPXr/Br03YPe4t84LhWpvnTmFXY=; b=dTpZWWQ58KDc+z7zIbdQC9ijT45Q3R/M81IRXxiy8ACKhfN4kjXIxf5C9vyj9NyY5W qPgsl41CGLY3kV2BQbjyvlETVjpS8401CvX9dIihjdGQdyAHG33eY5SGUuijO9Tk58Ua QUHiwrOBSPx4SdtcxP0h2acaw4OkTEUbR4b0ikLnUwSEqQCk6613PvFBGBnr5OvKWurg giZVgqeU+1aHk4IF8FRznVlKmESyitsqC1r2mRFd4nm6M7V/YpLS/gUToBXTaBmDFpVO T9IgP08XHFAXys4ZX1d1tyoN92jY+mSSgvWdd1vsya66/+sduFnUuuB23GduHRPBDBlP IwyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BEfcvqvWnV+tPAZPtPXr/Br03YPe4t84LhWpvnTmFXY=; b=L1xsZR29Oruan+itiC6PWDaCV3YAt3C7osvl6LR1YspV+9xTO2NCzgcJDFG/9FqSRc oFMt1GQHxy5weUbJgj+4hnv7QKSzjV0dDYQ6ov8KH8Jkjevi5bGciKsIVGHBKXTbT1yw RrmG9XK2d5MFzVxIzQ6pcXzbwYE4sUyiDsaxeeLeT4bYPZYuZgFWcCcgbI7DUFIJUJVS LUYyy/UIKeabncVW1g4OIOKZDfGljORVNAvU3r1oeReCh3+pEQPmw8BWNrYHnC8smM93 cMKSBuSWssIUGfSalkp6sWAtpyqCCcQ+QLcUQqPxcTnaU7ew4B1/JKrHd+NKyPBnxo+V XdUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0LnRd+AxBk9ZnJN4klyjgrHiyunOjXGLIG3ZXTQDQto6oZ+VcBYT4V7MACkwTu1eTaHIi+mj4krUI0x0Ohv3hj3PGbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.41.206 with SMTP id p197mr33556645iop.80.1453311011652; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:30:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.245.102 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:30:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:30:11 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dPRjQ_bHwWc7ZmOT1ar6rFYBiF4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: On our builds taking a long time since move to yetus From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141ed189911370529c756f3 --001a1141ed189911370529c756f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > Or we could come up with a yetus plugin that only checked test-compile on > jdk1.7 instead of the full unit test suite. I think that would nock the 2 > hours off as well? > Let me try and do this... This is best soln methinks for checking a patch... St.Ack > > --001a1141ed189911370529c756f3--