Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 012431828C for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65206 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2016 23:23:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 65106 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2016 23:23:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 65093 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2016 23:23:04 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:23:04 +0000 Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com (mail-lf0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id CFDB91A003F for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 17so94733376lfz.1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:23:03 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORGSW7p6UuQFDrx2Dzb+5KJpnX/4JzK3st1kGVkityMs5V7AYIBlituunjJkk5XeYhkbjd5s0MlDuEsvA== X-Received: by 10.25.162.11 with SMTP id l11mr7472936lfe.30.1453764182506; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:23:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.88.17 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:22:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Purtell Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:22:22 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding rel/ tags for previous HBase releases today To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11411b8caf8882052a30d951 --001a11411b8caf8882052a30d951 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have made new refs in rel/ pointing to the same SHA as the earlier tag and pushed them. I don't believe any committers have or are planning to make PGP signed commits. I also made a quick check with 'git log' of recent release refs and did not find signed commits. That is a practice we could adopt. I'd be supportive of that. All committers would need to do so to make it worthwhile. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > one question: will the new historic tags have your PGP signature rather > than the original RM(s)? If so, do we need to make a note of the cause of > this discrepancy? > > A vote in favor of leaving the old tags: since we've been treating release > tags as permalinks (regardless of their actual mutable state), folks are > likely to have links to them saved places. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Question: Would you like me to clean up afterward by pushing deletes for > > the soon-to-be duplicate release tags? No rush on an answer. I'll wait a > > few days for responses to come in. > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Purtell > > wrote: > > > > > I'll be adding tags under refs/rel/ for all previous HBase releases > > today, > > > using a snapshot of HBase's Apache git repository last updated at > Monday > > > January 25 13:20:47 PST 2016. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > -- > Sean > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --001a11411b8caf8882052a30d951--