hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MOB in branch-1? (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Merge branch hbase-11339 HBase MOB to trunk)
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:55:39 GMT
Pretty sure Sean expressed 1.2 is feature complete and I'd support that. Can we wait for 1.3
for MOB ? Can look at Spark connector then too. 

> On Jan 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Looks like 1.2.0 RC is in near future.
> 
> I wonder if it is time to revive this thread (due to customer interest).
> 
> As far as I can tell, the Mob related tests have been passing in the recent
> past.
> 
> Thanks
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it.
>> 
>> I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have that
>> discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Actually, it is actively changing in master branch on MOB feature made me
>>> think about: if we ever want to port MOB feature to branch-1, now is a
>> good
>>> time.  We can commit changes in both branches; otherwise, we probably
>> would
>>> miss some commits when we port MOB to branch-1 in a late time.
>>> 
>>> I am more thinking about 1.3 release (certainly not 1.2), which we still
>>> have some time to stabilize and allow interesting party to play with the
>>> feature and give feedback.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Stephen
>>> 
>>> PS. given the features we discussed in 2.0.0 in the last community
>> meeting,
>>> I think it would not release earlier than 1.3 :-), unless we
>> intentionally
>>> not find a release manager for 1.3.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread on target
>>>> dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work towards a faster
>>>> 2.0.0.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch of flakey
>>> tests
>>>>>> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled them till
>> someone
>>>> has
>>>>>> time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated code that
>> is
>>>> being
>>>>>> cleaned up (Matteo).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are there users who'd like it backported?
>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang <
>>>> syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch.  I saw bug fixes
>> happening
>>>> in
>>>>>>> master branch.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB in branch-1.
 I
>> am
>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>> if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the future to back
>> port
>>>> if
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> decide to do it in a late time.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <
>>> apurtell@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks Jon.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> When I'm back in the office I'll check out master and have
a
>> look
>>>> into
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>> locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in my opinion at
this
>>>> point it
>>>>>>>> would make the most sense for us to keep the MOB changes
in on
>>>> master
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> deal with any fallout in follow on issues. I think all who
voted
>>> +1
>>>> for
>>>>>>>> this change were aware that large changes like this can have
a
>>>>>>> temporarily
>>>>>>>> destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs are around
to help
>>>> clean
>>>>>>> up,
>>>>>>>> we should be good!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <
>> jon@cloudera.com
>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I had two clean full builds/unit test on my internal
setup and
>>> the
>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>>>> build went back to ~4325 total tests and failures on
Procedure
>>>> relate
>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I don't think mob is responsible for these failures.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Jon.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <
>>> jon@cloudera.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Although the the precommit buiid passed, and the
compilation
>>> and
>>>>>> mob
>>>>>>>>>> testing I ran after before the merge was commited
passed, It
>>>> looks
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>> the first full build after the merge [1] failed.
 It looked
>>> like
>>>>>>>>>> something hung along the way, and that most of the
previous
>>>> builds
>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>>> failed for various reasons. :(
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I kicked it off again have it do another try.  If
it is mob
>>>> related
>>>>>>>> we'll
>>>>>>>>>> take hunt it down and take care of it.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Jon.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <
>>>> jon@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I've merged the code in to master.  Thanks for
all the hard
>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng and thanks to all who have been involved
with
>>>> reviews,
>>>>>>>>>>> discussion, and voting!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jingcheng Du
<
>>>>>>>> jingcheng.du@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote passes with 8 +1s and no -1. Thanks
all for
>>> guiding,
>>>>>>> helping
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> voting!
>>>>>>>>>>>> We will work on the merge activities and
will let guys
>> know
>>>> about
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> detailed plan for merge time.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And thanks Jon for helping merge this branch
to trunk!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jingcheng
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the HBase Developer mailing list
archive at
>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>>>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>>>>>>>>> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>>>>>>> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   - Andy
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
-
>>> Piet
>>>>>> Hein
>>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sean
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>   - Andy
>> 
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>> 

Mime
View raw message