hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Adding rel/ tags for previous HBase releases today
Date Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:21:09 GMT
Looks good to me


On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org> wrote:

> Did I get the 1.1.3 release tag correct?
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I see.
> >
> > The release tags I pushed are not signed.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > To date the only signing has been on release tags. AFAIK, signed tags
> are
> > > only visible using "git show":
> > >
> > > ex:
> > >
> > > $ git show 1.0.0
> > > tag 1.0.0
> > > Tagger: Enis Soztutar <enis@apache.org>
> > > Date:   Sat Feb 21 14:32:18 2015 -0800
> > >
> > > Tag 1.0.0
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1
> > >
> > > iQIcBAABCgAGBQJU6Qd4AAoJEAhFjDnpZLX/TvkP/2qrbuvm2Fp7ifrhZ5pngApl
> > > plrI6yWUaXIS9cFj3fvInoXZ7CvKGSs6+ixngRsQBoYHvH1Lgu8SGcPVn5wj54WJ
> > > bnwnhlvsfp3NQ1/UuADqCYPb8xRkHdijMnCxeRyZPGR3piZSCN8MwTSsdKbIJU8u
> > > XCyDgFVx3IEOpphCDytZu5gZ6pRnvJfm3SqAjXC86/h8eTRvMwdbV1SwePWNA5HQ
> > > CMHUBkLm4Nw8xD0Z7AdsKb+GxeM2P/xtN+ETQI0mOXJ9aWfsDQaGsMi4DXQRBGeT
> > > h3Q/r6lImOjBqAnMeny3JLy3OIpDhFk7ezm2L7zwzaCgCGjWOcN/G7mmJkkl/i18
> > > 0MKKij7CPDP3yKfkhZs1HW68FalIaJ/kTQsRHIFOR+leVrB4xnaa2bx42lkWouqC
> > > 329qtubrGYN8jzqHSjoV5GvlAxz4tWdKz97N+WaBouzrQNkfAwkW9Kr/Cgr8XxQG
> > > h+CxPJN8NEWdQKzEK6ibeGjCp8ULKfhuPUtIq3U/9vnFs4gtt0I6AQo5VeWxpePu
> > > 7BO1utwlWSQExMb5ES7fbwabh26yd9ZIfELpx7Ek3HR9jCEu7rE0pneKHUEFGR0d
> > > +hXlYua9wcKmcftu4Q1nnz+tFFtCv9uosxWRMFHN/0RAw67rQ2D/hqS4vpnNsOQF
> > > rjvbLk7ASDRbjD15WxXj
> > > =ef23
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > commit 6c98bff7b719efdb16f71606f3b7d8229445eb81
> > > Author: Enis Soztutar <enis@apache.org>
> > > Date:   Sat Feb 14 19:41:51 2015 -0800
> > >
> > > ....SNIP...
> > >
> > > $  git show 1.1.2
> > > tag 1.1.2
> > > Tagger: Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org>
> > > Date:   Tue Sep 1 09:15:22 2015 -0700
> > >
> > > Tag 1.1.2
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > iQIcBAABCgAGBQJV5c8aAAoJEK2QOQccNIm9wjUQAIcZLsjYEKVohQJq5Wp3ZcrD
> > > Z8dN265BIG1/IyBvvVYDEKQljWXeb5sIYxjoE0jVkiC80IWKmRKVgmR1K+lElPyR
> > > Jx39ea+tNUKfrVj+vGN+3xOlLsc2RT+9x9EhKL+X38ZUUD7P0bSlcQvCekYFc0Ik
> > > 61VZDF24VXL4dvudahpOf+1mfQam9Ij4bEtwSe7tK8BSd1+FaPQKatEK5UqUAf+d
> > > TTi3dnsoyZKOgiaSesZ6QbocBhB7h68ormnY9dowkCdr6CK/qXuNlCYNqtJx3EKQ
> > > a0UsqbQNLimGANtO1llU8DiTbcS113z0SEiFyn4b/MuM8VtUQgMiLJx44o0ZhUB9
> > > GDzXXMdMM7xkJjc7mUT5kxyqwsAo+G5MtaAS2gkMeeF4l5sZ+xT+DUKWfwfVBe0D
> > > cg4JhhbX6/O4Nis92CQTbVLfgtF/K20cph5J7JiIf7wT+vkF2sIpb04INMCF/c+D
> > > P5XGQt8UJ+Lewiln2E56UOOjRKZdj2JXBEOkiXXFledoXuGsBHWLUi0vL6FmmsZN
> > > nd27SSsA/4cJerV4N91ekeqJ343oc6SYYuevfiTa6TIB2I9qRn7bLBFMedlzLSvt
> > > 0sKUgZvK3oDtOJ0N3gk+TkvXiHSBZQIpWw9H4hUXh+Vx5C+0FD+sGMSGea+md+b+
> > > YHyDoviUo72QtexwuS5c
> > > =I+Z4
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > ...SNIP...
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have made new refs in rel/ pointing to the same SHA as the earlier
> > tag
> > > > and pushed them.
> > > >
> > > > I don't believe any committers have or are planning to make PGP
> signed
> > > > commits. I also made a quick check with 'git log' of recent release
> > refs
> > > > and did not find signed commits. That is a practice we could adopt.
> I'd
> > > be
> > > > supportive of that. All committers would need to do so to make it
> > > > worthwhile.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > one question: will the new historic tags have your PGP signature
> > rather
> > > > > than the original RM(s)? If so, do we need to make a note of the
> > cause
> > > of
> > > > > this discrepancy?
> > > > >
> > > > > A vote in favor of leaving the old tags: since we've been treating
> > > > release
> > > > > tags as permalinks (regardless of their actual mutable state),
> folks
> > > are
> > > > > likely to have links to them saved places.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Question: Would you like me to clean up afterward by pushing
> > deletes
> > > > for
> > > > > > the soon-to-be duplicate release tags? No rush on an answer.
I'll
> > > wait
> > > > a
> > > > > > few days for responses to come in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > apurtell@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll be adding tags under refs/rel/ for all previous HBase
> > releases
> > > > > > today,
> > > > > > > using a snapshot of HBase's Apache git repository last
updated
> at
> > > > > Monday
> > > > > > > January 25 13:20:47 PST 2016.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >    - Andy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting
back. -
> > Piet
> > > > > Hein
> > > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    - Andy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
-
> Piet
> > > > Hein
> > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sean
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message