hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Moving the HBase site to use a stand-alone git repo
Date Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:07:58 GMT
+1 in theory. How will this work with integration of javadoc into the site?
How will RM's manage integrating site docs into their releases?

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks!
> You may recall the occasional emails dev@ gets from a Jenkins job Misty
> set
> up to make updating the website easier for us. They're titled "HBase
> Generate Website" and they give a series of steps any committer can run to
> push the changes live.
> Misty has been investigating automating this entirely[1], so that once
> updates land in the master source branch the website just updates. IMO,
> this would go a long way to improving how consistently updates make it to
> our primary public-facing presence.
> During our conversation with INFRA (on the jira[1] and in a infra@apache
> thread), the consensus seems to be that having an automated non-human
> process push to a repo that doesn't contain source that might lead to a
> release is acceptable. In contrast, such non-human pushing to our main repo
> (even if just to the asf-site branch) is seen as higher risk that would
> require a policy decision.
> Is everyone (especially PMCs) fine with us moving our site to a different
> repository?
> Presumably something like hbase-site. The expectation is that in almost all
> cases folks won't need to checkout or track this remote since the automated
> job will be pushing rendered updates for us.
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10722
> --
> Sean

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message