Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+RK=_AyL+Nwb20K=UG0=J++QBiX46hYB5K88LLA_U-nS2BZsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_CYr_+N6prd+twTC0TRKvPTEnYf4hf9T17Gmw8no8BTeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_AyL+Nwb20K=UG0=J++QBiX46hYB5K88LLA_U-nS2BZsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:34:22 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CANZa=Gt7KbaYxynkYk5AweOUiEct9NXP6T966=t6DgzYtUcxcg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available
To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01228d9e891e6e0524b6b863

--089e01228d9e891e6e0524b6b863
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Your LTT ran vs a cluster, or in standalone mode? My run in standalone is
failing consistently due to GC pause. I suppose it's possible my HDD is
failing, but the same test ran without incident with the the 1.1 RC, and
also with the.0.98 RC. Perhaps there's a perf degradation on 1.0 that's
been resolved on 1.1, exhibited by the conditions of my single machine? As
this is the terminal release of the 1.0 line and no one else has observed
issues, I'm inclined to proceed despite the test failure.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Built from source
> RAT check passes
> Loaded 1M rows with LoadTestTool, no unexpected log messages, reported
> latencies in line with expectations
> Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList, no errors
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The 1st HBase 1.0.3 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.3RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> also
> > available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1119/
> .
> >
> > The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be
> > found at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/1.0.2_1.0.3RC0_compat_report.html .
> > There are no reported source compatibility issues with user facing public
> > or LimitedPrivate interfaces. There are no reported binary compatibility
> > issues with user facing public interfaces. A constant was changed in
> > RegionServerSnapshotManager, classified as LimitedPrivate. This change
> was
> > made in commit 25b4427 by Enis, the branch RM for 1.0.
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The 76 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> > http://s.apache.org/0Cc .
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
> > at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday October
> > 23, 2015 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> > required to release.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

--089e01228d9e891e6e0524b6b863--