hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Two backport issues pending for 0.98.16
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:21:12 GMT
Sounds reasonable.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> And mine.
>
> Ask for a review if patch has to change significantly from what is upstream
> I'd say. Otherwise, commit.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > You have my consent for auto-commit backports :)
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up
> the
> > > 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
> > > (smile)
> > >
> > > If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
> > > matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your
> > consent
> > > to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week
> > for
> > > review.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a
> chance.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message