hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MOB in branch-1? (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Merge branch hbase-11339 HBase MOB to trunk)
Date Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:10:14 GMT
bq. I'll volunteer to RM 1.3

+1

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I haven't heard an user answer in the affirmative to wanting it.
>
> I'll volunteer to RM 1.3, whenever we need it. Premature to have that
> discussion without 1.2 even out the door yet, though.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Actually, it is actively changing in master branch on MOB feature made me
> > think about: if we ever want to port MOB feature to branch-1, now is a
> good
> > time.  We can commit changes in both branches; otherwise, we probably
> would
> > miss some commits when we port MOB to branch-1 in a late time.
> >
> > I am more thinking about 1.3 release (certainly not 1.2), which we still
> > have some time to stabilize and allow interesting party to play with the
> > feature and give feedback.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Stephen
> >
> > PS. given the features we discussed in 2.0.0 in the last community
> meeting,
> > I think it would not release earlier than 1.3 :-), unless we
> intentionally
> > not find a release manager for 1.3.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It's practically November. Matteo, are you up for a thread on target
> > > dates for 2.0.0 to start RCs?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > I feel the same lets keep branch-1 stable, and work towards a faster
> > > 2.0.0.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> IMO, MOB is still not settled in Master. It has a bunch of flakey
> > tests
> > > >> that are getting fixed by Jingcheng or I've disabled them till
> someone
> > > has
> > > >> time to look at them. There is also a load of duplicated code that
> is
> > > being
> > > >> cleaned up (Matteo).
> > > >>
> > > >> Its not ready to go back to branch-1 IMO.
> > > >>
> > > >> Are there users who'd like it backported?
> > > >> St.Ack
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Jiang <
> > > syuanjiangdev@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hello, guys, the MOB is in master branch.  I saw bug fixes
> happening
> > > in
> > > >> > master branch.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I just wonder whether there is a plan to put MOB in branch-1.
 I
> am
> > > >> afraid
> > > >> > if we don't do it now, it would be harder in the future to back
> port
> > > if
> > > >> we
> > > >> > decide to do it in a late time.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks
> > > >> > Stephen
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > apurtell@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Thanks Jon.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > When I'm back in the office I'll check out master and have
a
> look
> > > into
> > > >> > any
> > > >> > > locally repeatable test failures. Anyway in my opinion at
this
> > > point it
> > > >> > > would make the most sense for us to keep the MOB changes
in on
> > > master
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > deal with any fallout in follow on issues. I think all who
voted
> > +1
> > > for
> > > >> > > this change were aware that large changes like this can
have a
> > > >> > temporarily
> > > >> > > destabilizing effect. As long as the MOB devs are around
to help
> > > clean
> > > >> > up,
> > > >> > > we should be good!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <
> jon@cloudera.com
> > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > I had two clean full builds/unit test on my internal
setup and
> > the
> > > >> > latest
> > > >> > > > build went back to ~4325 total tests and failures on
Procedure
> > > relate
> > > >> > > tests
> > > >> > > > cases.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I don't think mob is responsible for these failures.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Jon.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <
> > jon@cloudera.com
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > Although the the precommit buiid passed, and the
compilation
> > and
> > > >> mob
> > > >> > > > > testing I ran after before the merge was commited
passed, It
> > > looks
> > > >> > like
> > > >> > > > > the first full build after the merge [1] failed.
 It looked
> > like
> > > >> > > > > something hung along the way, and that most of
the previous
> > > builds
> > > >> > had
> > > >> > > > > failed for various reasons. :(
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > I kicked it off again have it do another try.
 If it is mob
> > > related
> > > >> > > we'll
> > > >> > > > > take hunt it down and take care of it.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Jon.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/6672/
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh
<
> > > jon@cloudera.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >> I've merged the code in to master.  Thanks
for all the hard
> > > work
> > > >> > > > >> Jingcheng and thanks to all who have been
involved with
> > > reviews,
> > > >> > > > >> discussion, and voting!
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Jon
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Jingcheng
Du <
> > > >> > > jingcheng.du@intel.com>
> > > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> The vote passes with 8 +1s and no -1.
Thanks all for
> > guiding,
> > > >> > helping
> > > >> > > > and
> > > >> > > > >>> voting!
> > > >> > > > >>> We will work on the merge activities and
will let guys
> know
> > > about
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > >>> detailed plan for merge time.
> > > >> > > > >>> And thanks Jon for helping merge this
branch to trunk!
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > >> > > > >>> Jingcheng
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> --
> > > >> > > > >>> View this message in context:
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Merge-branch-hbase-11339-HBase-MOB-to-trunk-tp4073446.html
> > > >> > > > >>> Sent from the HBase Developer mailing
list archive at
> > > Nabble.com.
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> --
> > > >> > > > >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > > >> > > > >> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > > >> > > > >> // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > > >> > > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > > >> > > > > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > > >> > > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > > >> > > > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Best regards,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >    - Andy
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
-
> > Piet
> > > >> Hein
> > > >> > > (via Tom White)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message