Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50E801890C for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11598 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2015 18:15:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11503 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2015 18:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11492 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2015 18:15:40 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:15:40 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 2619D1A0144 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbjg10 with SMTP id jg10so187976igb.0 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.1.115 with SMTP id 19mr17272187igl.67.1440699338969; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.59.23 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM From: Nick Dimiduk To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc110e53db0e051e4ef42d --047d7bdc110e53db0e051e4ef42d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sounds good to me. Have at it Matteo! On Thursday, August 27, 2015, Stack wrote: > Last night at the HBase dev workshop, during discussion of 2.0.0 (what will > be in it, when will it come out), it was noted that there is as yet no RM > for hbase-2.0.0. > > A bunch of us suggested Matteo and he was up for it. > > Folks good with that? Anyone else interested in being RM? > > +1 on Matteo from me, > St.Ack > --047d7bdc110e53db0e051e4ef42d--