Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ACA218298 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33114 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2015 12:15:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 33021 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2015 12:15:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 33009 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2015 12:15:41 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 12:15:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4E9F1817AA for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:15:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.001 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RHR325iECd5i for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3BDF24C0D1 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oigx81 with SMTP id x81so30198642oig.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:15:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6IPGN3oQo+7p+L+Ysl7UpWHnJY5pLQ5WU7WE97bjzl4=; b=gspX8GNcDIDv2osFCoByN2mz7DMJ8k+AIgXd2n+fJQf6FyjfBAwEED0hod724b8eAp USOMf1XNBqm0hrWkA6EgDxj1s0YFuuO9atXObsDRENZhAxx0KyUWp7iGkFYSEsFSKorS U7H6AEmU86+DVPkjO4575TEWbE0t/k231Ta/Luu3k31aRpJRwfXWgHEfEGGDskBN1B4f vQPxjct57JQY5npCTnqaOtDBs22rk2eS/TF8Jzi1RHztsqAgmirNLr0uCRsWQe73XJIN I0cgSh7xqZSGetFkYVTmxB5p4rTnXa1ZotGwFDodHVel91L3L42rjl/ytIIfapNkyeRj YWDg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl66/TvvDg++RIGZwxwoBf0PxBzPl6OfwoNH8CcqLLhdreRxgXJ6lDEIIsjjpuU1mIOr7Ey MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.56.97 with SMTP id z1mr25938877oep.59.1435752927756; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.9.133 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 05:15:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <82332905.2879891.1435712329311.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <75F348B6-53F4-4626-AC39-D24A629FBE70@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:15:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] correcting abusive behavior on mailing lists was (Re: [DISCUSS] Multi-Cluster HBase Client) From: Ted Malaska To: dev@hbase.apache.org Cc: Hbase-User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c204fa3e9c650519cf4782 --001a11c204fa3e9c650519cf4782 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Should I start a new Thread to talk about multi client? I sorry this all had to happen on my thread. I hope I didn't cause it. My goal is simple I would like to set up some thing that would help HBase compete in the multi cluster up up use cases. The design in this thread I think is a good starting point, but I'm super open to modifying it to improve on it. I just feel as more the cloud and global cluster setups become a thing the more this use case is going to come up, and I would love for HBase to have a simple solution that covers the majority of use cases. Ted Malaska On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Beyond the personal insults, he is clearly arguing for the sake of arguin= g. > Not productive. I'm also with Stack -- moderation is work. Ban. It's not > like there aren't other outlets for this kind of behavior, just don't let > them do it here. > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Purtell > > wrote: > > > Huh? This is not about being caremad over some technical issue, this is > > about preserving a productive space for communication free from toxic > > people casting abuse while being "funny" and "smart". Please go back on > the > > original thread and re-read the interaction with Sean. Are you going to > > defend that as within the bounds of acceptable behavior? Is this the > first > > time that has happened? > > > > > > > On Jun 30, 2015, at 5:58 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > > > > > > Moderating is better than outright banning, I think.While Micheal is > > sometimes infuriating, he's also funny and smart. > > > Can we have a group of moderators? I'd volunteer, but not if I'm the > > only one. > > > > > > -- Lars > > > From: Stack > > > To: Hbase-User > > > Cc: "dev@hbase.apache.org" > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:25 PM > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] correcting abusive behavior on mailing lists w= as > > (Re: [DISCUSS] Multi-Cluster HBase Client) > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Stack wrote: > > >> > > >> I volunteer to help moderate. > > >> St.Ack > > > Sorry. Changed my mind. I'm not going to do more work because of > Michael. > > > Let the filters do the work for us. Ban him for 3 months. > > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Sean Busbey > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> (I took the liberty of moving us off of Ted's feature discussion > > thread) > > >>> > > >>> A three month ban sounds better than a permanent ban. But it still > > seems > > >>> likely to just result in the ban-ee walking away from teh community > or > > >>> escalating. > > >>> > > >>> Would we consider enforcing moderation on posts for the three month > > period > > >>> instead of an outright ban? > > >>> > > >>> It's more work for whomever has moderator rights on the mailing lis= t, > > but > > >>> it provides a better feedback cycle for improved behavior. Presumin= g > > that > > >>> I > > >>> don't already have such access as a PMC member, I'd be willing to > > >>> volunteer > > >>> to help take on part of the burden. > > >>> > > >>> -Sean > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> It was suggested privately that we try a temporary ban first, to b= e > > >>> clear > > >>>> that current behavior and communication is unacceptable and won't = be > > >>>> tolerated further, yet allow for the possibility of a return to th= e > > >>>> community should the message be received. So let me amend my > proposal > > - > > >>> a > > >>>> three month temporary ban. > > >>>> > > >>>> Also, the reason I am asking for public feedback before calling fo= r > a > > >>> vote > > >>>> is this would be the first time in the history of the project we > would > > >>> take > > >>>> this very unfortunate step. It pains me personally but enough is > > >>> enough, in > > >>>> my opinion. However, if you are not comfortable with that then > please > > >>> speak > > >>>> up and I won't ask the PMC to vote on this. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andrew Purtell < > apurtell@apache.org > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I've had enough and would like to ask the user and dev communitie= s > if > > >>>> they > > >>>>> would mind if we vote on a permanent ban of Michael Segal - any a= nd > > >>> all > > >>>>> email accounts he may choose to set up - from all HBase mailing > > lists. > > >>>> The > > >>>>> basic lack of courtesy and constant naysaying is corrosive. Nobod= y > > >>> trying > > >>>>> to volunteer their time here deserves his continuing abuse. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Segel < > > >>>> michael_segel@hotmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Sean, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> You=E2=80=99re a developer, or just some higher level primate th= at pounds > > >>> code? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I don=E2=80=99t want to embarrass you, but what do they teach in > engineering > > >>>>>> schools these days? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> - Andy > > >>>> > > >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Pie= t > > Hein > > >>>> (via Tom White) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Sean > > > > > > --001a11c204fa3e9c650519cf4782--