Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D1F018608 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27881 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2015 14:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 27795 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2015 14:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 27783 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2015 14:54:29 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:54:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B234B1A6B24 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:54:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.979 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.979 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HijN775HcIwN for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 975F6205B4 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laar3 with SMTP id r3so227615753laa.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=oQJJQvqq0KkLH3Tvep10lV+JdOkdrZPUSdYq8vwSWuk=; b=JLiKe9bvrdXqF1WOrJO9BxqDAA+m7uC1QyYlOYef4kuFSo76zcFTn7F0EYoYWY48j1 dUtimBbf+zgGo39sjYt6tNru72W0y8+TIEeSnhAzB6D0oo/wCtpQBNzGDDvZBGq0SD80 BKha3McnqNlf1FQxncrN4jurAQTejGt6ucWd91XhOMDZZa1FlRbB3hh6tnzxzfvJnVGZ CAlyxPCUKU+N1gnNZ4y4naXqvcUsys+DaZoQrTUSVMPerwKCCxcIw1U64j5WvL9blVkd QQg4I+23xOw6M5BGWz1neRvB7kg2YFM9Xt4ld5baTmH1zreH+XPpsGDg/JSc84lZTLxK jCrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1+z7lQ6iqYvlPIJCbpYkSdLWW4gLWC52vdi1EP5syWUcax8wQ84HHAPTH5A9VFJsykEgz X-Received: by 10.112.166.106 with SMTP id zf10mr9973633lbb.36.1436367221040; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.152.82 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 07:53:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Busbey Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:53:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1 To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c26586fa4725051a5e4d75 --001a11c26586fa4725051a5e4d75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Folks! For the 1.2 release, I think the consensus is to disable Distributed Log Replay by default due to lack of sufficient testing. At least, that's the only feedback I've heard so far. :) Anyone object to that? Presuming no one does,what do folks think about just disabling it by default in the current branch-1? That isn't to say it couldn't switch to on-by-default at a latter 1.y release. It's just that we had to turn it off right before the 1.1 releases as well, and I'd prefer we avoid these last minute changes in favor of waiting until someone has the time to prioritize thorough testing. -- Sean --001a11c26586fa4725051a5e4d75--