hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
Subject Re: DISCUSSION: lets do a developer workshop on near-term work
Date Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:56:47 GMT
I'm in favor of anything that improves performance (and preferably doesn't set us back into
a world that's worse than C due to the lack of pointers in Java).Never said "I don't like
it", it's just that I'm perhaps asking for more numbers and justification in weighing the
pros and cons.
I can represent your side Ram (and Anoop). I've been known always argue both side of a discussion
and to never take sides easily (drives some folks crazy). And Stack's there too, he yell at
me where needed :)

Perhaps we can do it a bit later in the evening so there is a fighting chance that folks on
IST can participate. I know that some of our folks on IST would love to participate in the
backup discussion).

Like Enis, I'm also happy to host. We're in Downtown SF. I'd just need an approx. number of
folks.

-- Lars

      From: ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com>
 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>; lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>

 Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:10 AM
 Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: lets do a developer workshop on near-term work
   
Hi 
What time will it be on August 26th?
@LarsYa. I know that you are not generally in favour of this offheaping stuff.  May be if
we (from India) can attend this meeting remotely your thoughts can be discussed and also the
current state of this work.
RegardsRam


On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:28 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:

Works for me. I'll be back in the Bay Area the week of August 9th.
We have done a _lot_ of work on backups as well - ours are more complicated as we wanted fast
per-tenant restores, so data is "grouped" by tenant. Would like to sync up on that (hopefully
some of the folks who wrote most of the code will be in town, I'll check).

Also interested in the "Time" and "offheap" parts (although you folks usually do not like
what I think about the offheap efforts :) ).
Would like to add the following topics:


- "Timestamp Resolution". Or making space for more bits in the timestamps (happy to cover
that, unless it's part of the "Time" topic)


- "Replication". We found that replication cannot keep up with high write loads, due to the
fact that replicated is strictly single threaded per regionserver (even though we have multiple
region servers on the sink side)


- "Spark integration" (Ted Malaska?)


OK... Out now to make a "bullshit hat".

-- Lars

________________________________
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: lets do a developer workshop on near-term work


I'm planning to be in the Bay area the week of the 24th of August.

--
Sean



On Jul 14, 2015 7:53 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I can be up in your area in August.
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good. It has been a while we did the talk-aton.
> > >
> > > I'll be off starting 25 of July, so I prefer something next week if
> > > possible.
> > >
> > > You ever coming back? If so, when? I'm back on 10th of August (Mikhail
> on
> > the 20th).
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Matteo and I were thinking it time devs got together for a pow-wow.
> > There
> > > > is a bunch of stuff in flight at the moment (see below list) and it
> > would
> > > > be good to meet and whiteboard, surface goodo ideas that have gone
> > > dormant
> > > > in JIRA, or revisit designs/proposals out in JIRA-attached google doc
> > > that
> > > > need socializing.
> > > >
> > > > You can only come if you are wearing your bullshit hat.
> > > >
> > > > Topics we'd go over could include:
> > > >
> > > > + Our filesystem layout will not work if 1M regions (Matteo/Stack)
> > > > + Current state of the offheaping of read path and alternate KeyValue
> > > > implementation (Anoop/Ram)
> > > > + Append rejigger (Elliott)
> > > > + A Pv2-based Assign (Matteo/Steven)
> > > > + Splitting meta/1M regions
> > > > + The revived Backup (Vladimir)
> > > > + Time (Enis)
> > > > + The overloaded SequenceId (Stack)
> > > > + Upstreaming IT testing (Dima/Sean)
> > > > + hbase-2.0.0
> > > >
> > > > I put names by folks I know could talk to the topic. If you want to
> > take
> > > > over a topic or put your name by one, just say.  Suggest that
> > discussion
> > > > lead off with a 5-10minute on current state of
> > > > thought/design/implementation.
> > > >
> > > > What do others think?
> > > >
> > > > What date would suit folks?
> > > >
> > > > Anyone want to host?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Matteo and St.Ack
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>




  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message