Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66DE718007 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86537 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2015 16:08:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86435 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2015 16:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86424 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2015 16:08:48 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:08:48 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 67F741A04B1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oigx81 with SMTP id x81so2983404oig.1 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:08:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.174.39 with SMTP id bp7mr25025648oec.70.1434384527735; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:08:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.175.206 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Purtell Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:08:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JDK8 for master To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011846843f459f051890ac79 --089e011846843f459f051890ac79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hey Folks, > > I know we've talked before about going Java 8 for master[1], but it's been > on my mind again lately[2]. > > I'm in the process of updating the postcommit builds for master to be a > matrix build to do java 7 and java 8, like the ones for 1.2's branch. But > it occurs to me that we could just make the jump now and then I could make > that build a normal jdk8 only job. > > thoughts? > > [1]: > > http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/JDK7-Language-Features-td4071169.html > [2]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13344 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13887 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13747 > > -- > Sean > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --089e011846843f459f051890ac79--