hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Date Wed, 06 May 2015 20:07:54 GMT
I'm also traveling today.

I've already extended the vote for this RC to Sunday, and since no one has
said this is a -1 -worthy regression, this candidate continues to stand.

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Formally, -0
>
> Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on
> Friday?
>
> I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be
> able to get to it until tonight.
>
> > On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> >
> > Is this a formal -1?
> >
> > I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> > I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> >
> >>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
> >> the
> >>> poms and sinking the RC?
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
> >>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone
and
> >>>>> rarely changes.
> >>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
> >> dependencies
> >>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
> >>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sean
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message