hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Hsieh <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Merge of the hbase-11339 mob branch into master.
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 00:01:51 GMT
Comments inline

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> w.r.t. hbck, the two actions listed below look good.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is a useful feature, Jon.
> > >
> > > I went over the mega-patch and left some comments on review board.
> > >
> > > I noticed that hbck was not included in the patch. Neither did I find a
> > > sub-task of HBASE-11339 that covers hbck.
> > >
> > > Do you or Jingcheng plan to add MOB-aware capability for hbck ?
> > >
> > > Ted -- what in particular are you thinking about for a mob-aware hbck?
> >
> > here are a few things I can think of:
> >
> > - hbck doesn't berak mob
>

hbck not getting broken by mob should be a check we do and will be done
before merge.

> - a full table scan job that verifies all mob refs have values
> >
>
I don't think this is a hard requirement for merge.

wdyt ted?


> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
> >
>



-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message