hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.0 (RC0) is available.
Date Wed, 06 May 2015 19:16:59 GMT
Formally, -0

Given tomorrow is hbasecon perhaps it would be better to spin a RC on Friday? 

I can take HBASE-13637 but am sitting on a plane at the moment. Won't be able to get to it
until tonight. 

> On May 6, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I prefer to patch the POMs.
> 
> Is this a formal -1?
> 
> I've opened HBASE-13637 for tracking this issue. Let's get it fixed and
> I'll spin a new RC tonight.
> 
>>> On May 5, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So what's the conclusion here? Are we dropping 2.2 support or updating
>> the
>>> poms and sinking the RC?
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> We could patch our POMs to reference the hadoop-minikdc artifact
>>>>> independently of the rest of the Hadoop packages. It's standalone and
>>>>> rarely changes.
>>>> +1. I've been using HBase to test Hadoop changes for isolating
>> dependencies
>>>> from downstream folks (HADOOP-11804), and I've just been leaving the
>>>> hadoop-minikdc artifact as-is due to these very reasons.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sean
>> 

Mime
View raw message