Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63C9D17A57 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42379 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2015 17:52:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 42299 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2015 17:52:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 42286 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2015 17:52:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:52:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: message received from 54.164.171.186 which is an MX secondary for dev@hbase.apache.org) Received: from [54.164.171.186] (HELO mx1-us-east.apache.org) (54.164.171.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:52:01 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1CF7E42AB6 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so187486407wiz.1 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=/blT/HYVtkOS3Qu9xNcqukBMzZowWxVQ8dp4kOKNBaE=; b=JRAyWdeq95DESZwtirhQlODjM2Sr7HC9HdXeODL9HEctCmbBhJvcUNHM23tv2jwGc3 bn9LI5YyyzgD+C/LnlJ3nF8Gwyxjhz6mUQDDvZZyMDf5W3u3gjv7vjGy/CVTRAKShxEv /rU4KKzd65lDOyNp5G2amB0DaQKYgaPii/6G6peYPITXRihFPSDzTmW6pA/mGl5Z528O QuXeqa+5gBLgk1cCrwchj3ssCUdMF0q0HeyXfXABKFANnRuq64n0c8sbTGTtoNjhCmtQ maL8EgG8+bxkO61yUHTjIQySdQnVR4QZ13dDVp0O8Zn8dSM9rnwhmq5zjrBFJpujWlRQ 5RUA== X-Received: by 10.180.14.134 with SMTP id p6mr7964358wic.44.1429725100373; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.227.196 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:51:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Nick Dimiduk Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:51:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Spinning up for 1.1 Release To: hbase-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04155418bc023b051453d061 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04155418bc023b051453d061 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 My mistake Jerry, you're correct. My pre-coffee brain was thinking that by upgrading Hadoop we'd promote the version of Jackson under us. This is not the case because we have an explicit dependency (though maybe maven is promoting this for us for the builds anyway?) Point is, we have issues that need attention before the release. I'm glad to see I have your attention ;) On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jerry He wrote: > Hi, Nick > > I probably missed something here. Upgrading to hadoop 2.6 would help > HBASE-13149? > >> HBASE-13149 and HBASE-13339 are making a strong argument for us to bump > >> the Hadoop version to 2.6 for this release. > > Jerry > --f46d04155418bc023b051453d061--