Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0A46179DA for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96218 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2015 00:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 96130 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2015 00:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 96117 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2015 00:10:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:10:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: message received from 54.76.25.247 which is an MX secondary for dev@hbase.apache.org) Received: from [54.76.25.247] (HELO mx1-eu-west.apache.org) (54.76.25.247) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:09:44 +0000 Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (mail-pd0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D42D72313E for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbnk13 with SMTP id nk13so32220105pdb.0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:08:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=NmLApdD31AzBx2Z7Le2A8WIpnP0Qpwke2vuePg38tuc=; b=CEwCWAgW3+BYDmc44fs6+GhzhP7xPJVj1DzCvUC/Ga6EZXe3iHqcHZe6BOATYsM8Vv L2u8c54gyL+hfxtQS3i0+/buiPYbj4vMW39bZQM9Xee46If6YD8mnYpJ/PJ/3TpS82Vi eWMtJWduVm48MI0ShR+Y8AKmfVkZ22Umt0oRGFHQVJgyRDDpXKRTP8k9UTgtLwrcqe1c jTOfBOXTvvmLlm2rWLKTHbg7faXKGpMDUjY3uCrSXYP1jC7/+DS8hY4C9d05nsDUZTls 76UEgonvy54fUF7a4rfByt0Lpb1i8Z3GdkO+PM0kJit/paE4qgpNanVxXXZEn8l1eg32 RlLA== X-Received: by 10.70.119.36 with SMTP id kr4mr367959pdb.39.1429834136314; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1010:b024:94a3:d113:a6f1:19e3:cf73? ([2600:1010:b024:94a3:d113:a6f1:19e3:cf73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ax2sm9278477pac.21.2015.04.23.17.08.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:08:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Ted Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Clarifying interface evolution freedom in patch releases (was: Re: [VOTE] Third release candidate for HBase 1.0.1 (RC2)) Message-Id: <01B308D0-24CF-44B9-A60F-E16ABBBA8037@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:08:54 -0700 References: <5537D45D.3020207@gmail.com> <5537DBF5.6080204@gmail.com> <553981ED.2040005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <553981ED.2040005@gmail.com> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12D508) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 as well.=20 > On Apr 23, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: >=20 > Stack wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Purtell wr= ote: >>>=20 >>> > So "we like semver", not "we use semver"? >>> > >>> > >> and Sean's >>=20 >>> > No longer claiming semver would also have the added benefit of making= it for >> me to easier to explain our compatibility promises to people. >>=20 >> Yeah, 'we like semvar'/'we are almost semvar' + and are actively working >> toward 'semvar' would give us leeway that we seem to need as we learn wha= t >> semvar implies. >>=20 >> Does this 'admission' help with the which-hadoop thread too? >>=20 >> St.Ack >=20 > +1