hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Clarifying interface evolution freedom in patch releases (was: Re: [VOTE] Third release candidate for HBase 1.0.1 (RC2))
Date Sun, 26 Apr 2015 03:01:18 GMT
I'm game for giving it a shot if we can build some confidence it won't
cause other issues.  However given we're moving to Hadoop 2.6 I think we've
already relaxed the constraints and this won't buy us much. More trouble
than it's worth?

On Saturday, April 25, 2015, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is an interesting idea from Sean.
>
> > On the Jackson thing, are folks opposed to compiling with the current
> older
> > version and then packaging the newer version? That would make sure we
> don't
> > start using 1.9 features in a way that would prevent downstream users
> from
> > downgrading to 1.8, which combined with a release note would address my
> > concerns.
>
> I wonder if people have objections or concerns on this.  Maybe cause
> confusion down the road, or in the pom or assembly?
>
> Looks like we are moving in the direction of relaxing a little, and upgrade
> Jackson in HBase 1.1.
>
> Jerry
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message