hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Spinning up for 1.1 Release
Date Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:14:25 GMT
No.

semver[1] has an explicit policy to have identifiers in this format:

MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH[-IDENTIFIER]

>From [1]:

Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as
extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.
Bullet point 9 in [1] talks about this. If we want to do "developer
preview" releases, we should use 1.1.0-alpha, 1.1.0-beta kind of version
name.

[1] http://semver.org/

Enis

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:

> Sorry guys,
>
> I'm know I'm very late in the process, but should we not release 1.2.0
> instead of 1.1.0?
>
> 0.97 was for dev
> 0.99 was for dev
> Should 1.1 be for dev too? Should we keep even numbers for prod releases
> and odd for dev?
>
> JM
>
> 2015-04-22 17:32 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org>:
>
> > I would love to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260 in
> > if
> > possible.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to have it
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431
> > > in.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > You have my attention all the time, Nick :-)
> > > > We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149.  Sean, Andy,
> > Enis?
> > > > Of course the last resort is we do nothing but document it with
> manual
> > > > workaround or manual jar replacement in 1.1.
> > > > I am available to do any verification if there is any proposal.
> > > >
> > > > Jerry
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message