hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Spinning up for 1.1 Release
Date Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:11:13 GMT
Any thoughts on HBASE-13517 ? It has no extra code changes so it shouldn't
be de-stabilizing.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Cody Marcel <cmarcel@salesforce.com> wrote:

> The port for PHOENIX-1728
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> from master is still
> in progress. I should have the rest of the branches update today.
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Devs --
> >
> > Branch-1.1 is officially closed for feature enhancements, with the
> > following exceptions: HBASE-11339, HBASE-13260, HBASE-13431.
> >
> > Please limit commits to blocker and critical bug fixes. I also ask that
> you
> > please ping me as patches go in, so that I might review them in relation
> to
> > the testing that's been done. I do not require you wait for a +1 from me
> on
> > these issues, simply a courtesy notification. Please use your best
> > judgement re: the above request.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > semver[1] has an explicit policy to have identifiers in this format:
> > >
> > > MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH[-IDENTIFIER]
> > >
> > > From [1]:
> > >
> > > Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as
> > > extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.
> > > Bullet point 9 in [1] talks about this. If we want to do "developer
> > > preview" releases, we should use 1.1.0-alpha, 1.1.0-beta kind of
> version
> > > name.
> > >
> > > [1] http://semver.org/
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry guys,
> > > >
> > > > I'm know I'm very late in the process, but should we not release
> 1.2.0
> > > > instead of 1.1.0?
> > > >
> > > > 0.97 was for dev
> > > > 0.99 was for dev
> > > > Should 1.1 be for dev too? Should we keep even numbers for prod
> > releases
> > > > and odd for dev?
> > > >
> > > > JM
> > > >
> > > > 2015-04-22 17:32 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > I would love to see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260
> > > in
> > > > > if
> > > > > possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > Enis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > > > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to have it
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431
> > > > > > in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have my attention all the time, Nick :-)
> > > > > > > We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149. 
Sean,
> > Andy,
> > > > > Enis?
> > > > > > > Of course the last resort is we do nothing but document
it with
> > > > manual
> > > > > > > workaround or manual jar replacement in 1.1.
> > > > > > > I am available to do any verification if there is any proposal.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jerry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message