hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cody Marcel <cmar...@salesforce.com>
Subject Re: Spinning up for 1.1 Release
Date Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:32:11 GMT
The port for PHOENIX-1728
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1728> from master is still
in progress. I should have the rest of the branches update today.

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Devs --
>
> Branch-1.1 is officially closed for feature enhancements, with the
> following exceptions: HBASE-11339, HBASE-13260, HBASE-13431.
>
> Please limit commits to blocker and critical bug fixes. I also ask that you
> please ping me as patches go in, so that I might review them in relation to
> the testing that's been done. I do not require you wait for a +1 from me on
> these issues, simply a courtesy notification. Please use your best
> judgement re: the above request.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > No.
> >
> > semver[1] has an explicit policy to have identifiers in this format:
> >
> > MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH[-IDENTIFIER]
> >
> > From [1]:
> >
> > Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as
> > extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.
> > Bullet point 9 in [1] talks about this. If we want to do "developer
> > preview" releases, we should use 1.1.0-alpha, 1.1.0-beta kind of version
> > name.
> >
> > [1] http://semver.org/
> >
> > Enis
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry guys,
> > >
> > > I'm know I'm very late in the process, but should we not release 1.2.0
> > > instead of 1.1.0?
> > >
> > > 0.97 was for dev
> > > 0.99 was for dev
> > > Should 1.1 be for dev too? Should we keep even numbers for prod
> releases
> > > and odd for dev?
> > >
> > > JM
> > >
> > > 2015-04-22 17:32 GMT-04:00 Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > I would love to see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260
> > in
> > > > if
> > > > possible.
> > > >
> > > > Enis
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, rajeshbabu@apache.org <
> > > > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would like to have it
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431
> > > > > in.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You have my attention all the time, Nick :-)
> > > > > > We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149.  Sean,
> Andy,
> > > > Enis?
> > > > > > Of course the last resort is we do nothing but document it with
> > > manual
> > > > > > workaround or manual jar replacement in 1.1.
> > > > > > I am available to do any verification if there is any proposal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jerry
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message