hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Third release candidate for HBase 1.0.1 (RC2) is available. Please vote by April 24 2015
Date Sat, 25 Apr 2015 16:16:03 GMT
+1 for resuming the vote.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, consider voting resumed.
> Andrew, is +1 for the RC or for resuming voting?
>
> Let me extend the VOTE until Sunday 11:59PM PDT for lost time.
>
> Enis
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Can this VOTE thread come back to life now?
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ​Let's postpone this vote.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agreed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > See the threads on dev@ titled "​Clarifying interface evolution
> > > freedom
> > > > in
> > > > > patch releases" and "The Renumbering (proposed)".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, "Enis Söztutar" <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think the agreement is to continue with the RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised
> when I
> > > > > noticed
> > > > > > > method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated
classes.
> > > This
> > > > > > means
> > > > > > > that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not
work
> > > > against
> > > > > > > 1.0.0 which seems undesirable for a bugfix release. I read
over
> > the
> > > > > book
> > > > > > > section on compatibility and didn't see this addressed,
so I
> > > thought
> > > > > I'd
> > > > > > > ask.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think this is allowed. Did not check it though.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Enis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's not allowed normally under semver. There's already another
> > > thread
> > > > > > going on this though.
> > > > > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message