Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGHyZ6JJe2nOmxK028nJhBmfz1nrx2zSnCGzcEtWccakCB0Jxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGHyZ6JuhOhzTEZag3q6Xg==AxSR3md+TYUh=9BK0gC0NZkfYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+RK=_CJUuv=69_4UGYjwUidASD6znX_ko5eON18MLeVGtpppQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGHyZ6JLxGVnG4P+w-0c+Mx1mNbOhkwWiwTwsxsRYxET5mUBpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+RK=_BSbgeBwnPWt9JNSSpPeSCm3qdpQO5SrF4=8gG58rpLng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGHyZ6JJe2nOmxK028nJhBmfz1nrx2zSnCGzcEtWccakCB0Jxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:37:11 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALvzVW0VWSU52pKed1pPg_NKbw4Ny3PEsQgDW10vp5eOPNtW3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rough goal timelines for 1.1 and 2.0
From: Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c23c7e25f97a05114311a4

--001a11c23c7e25f97a05114311a4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm most looking forward to rpc quotas and the buffer improvements that
stack has put in. So for me getting a 1.1 in May 1 would be cool.
That would allow us to talk about what was just released at HBaseCon, and
maybe even have 1.1.0 in production at places.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:

> The only reason I can think of to make decisions now would be if we want to
> ensure we have consensus for the changes for Phoenix and enough time to
> implement them.
>
> Given that AFAIK it's those changes that'll drive having a 1.1 release,
> seems prudent. But I haven't been tracking the changes lately.
>
> I think we're all in agreement that something needs to be done, and that
> HBase 1.1 and Phoenix 5 are the places to do it. Probably it won't be
> contentious to just decide as changes are ready?
>
> --
> Sean
> On Mar 13, 2015 1:28 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > That was my question.. We can discuss them independently? Or is there a
> > reason not to?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do we need to couple decisions for 1.1 and 2.0 in the same
> discussion?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Like what? Interface changes for Phoenix maybe?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>

--001a11c23c7e25f97a05114311a4--