Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFA1B173B1 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24320 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2015 22:58:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 24233 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2015 22:58:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 24222 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2015 22:58:36 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:58:36 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id CE2891A0465 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oifl3 with SMTP id l3so35150519oif.0 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:58:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.87.74 with SMTP id v10mr9556153obz.50.1427324315068; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:58:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.181.4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:57:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1986794188.2070233.1427323659937.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> From: Andrew Purtell Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:57:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Private MVN repos in HBase's pom.xml To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Cc: lars hofhansl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cc21ac771de051224d6e2 --089e013cc21ac771de051224d6e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't believe we've needed that since we moved away from custom versions of Surefire. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Stack wrote: > I tried it recently and doesn't seem like we need it anymore. I was going > to remove it but... > St.Ack > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:47 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > > > I just noticed that Gary's repo is still listed in our pom. Do we still > > need that? Should we remove it? > > Not that I do not trust Gary... :) Just that we should limit ourselves > to > > the public repos. > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > ghelmling.testing > > Gary Helmling test repo > > http://people.apache.org/~garyh/mvn/ > > > > true > > > > > > true > > > > > > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --089e013cc21ac771de051224d6e2--