hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Jiang <syuanjiang...@gmail.com>
Subject Question on DisableTableHandler#handleDisableTable()
Date Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:00:10 GMT
In DisableTableHandler#handleDisableTable(), we do the following:
(1). Set the table state to DISABLING
(2). Try to mark all regions of table (based on in-memory state of the
active master) to offline
(3). If 2 succeed, then set the table state to DISABLED

My question is if (2) failed, it would continue to co-processor post
operation and complete the process() call.  This will leave the table in
DISABLING state without letting user know that the operation actually
fails.  Is this desired behavior?


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message