hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Rough goal timelines for 1.1 and 2.0
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:38:34 GMT
+1 for Nick.Let's spread the joy around.
      From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> 
 Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 5:45 PM
 Subject: Re: Rough goal timelines for 1.1 and 2.0
   
+1 on Nick being the RM for release 1.1



On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would love to see 1.1 in or before May. We already have good stuff in
> branch-1, enough to justify a minor release. Some of the "features" are
> still in the pipeline waiting to be finished (MOB, procV2, etc).
> Personally, I think we should get HBASE-12972, and ProcV2, RPC quotas (and
> other multi-tenancy improvements not yet backported) and call it 1.1.
>
> I would +1 either Nick or Andrew, both should be excellent RMs.
>
> Enis
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > ​FWIW, the Region proposal (HBASE-12972) is ready for review. The
> companion
> > issue for SplitTransaction and RegionMergeTransaction (HBASE-12975) needs
> > more discussion but could be ready to go in a <= one month timeframe.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I think we can learn a lesson or two from the vendor marketing machines
> > --
> > > a release timed with HBaseCon would be ideal in this regard. My
> > obligations
> > > to the event are minimal, so I'm willing to volunteer as RM for 1.1. Do
> > we
> > > think we can make some of these decisions in time for spinning RC's in
> > > mid-April? That's just about a month away.
> > >
> > > -n
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm most looking forward to rpc quotas and the buffer improvements
> that
> > > > stack has put in. So for me getting a 1.1 in May 1 would be cool.
> > > > That would allow us to talk about what was just released at HBaseCon,
> > and
> > > > maybe even have 1.1.0 in production at places.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The only reason I can think of to make decisions now would be if
we
> > > want
> > > > to
> > > > > ensure we have consensus for the changes for Phoenix and enough
> time
> > to
> > > > > implement them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given that AFAIK it's those changes that'll drive having a 1.1
> > release,
> > > > > seems prudent. But I haven't been tracking the changes lately.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we're all in agreement that something needs to be done, and
> > > that
> > > > > HBase 1.1 and Phoenix 5 are the places to do it. Probably it won't
> be
> > > > > contentious to just decide as changes are ready?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sean
> > > > > On Mar 13, 2015 1:28 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > That was my question.. We can discuss them independently? Or
is
> > > there a
> > > > > > reason not to?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sean Busbey <
> busbey@cloudera.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > > > apurtell@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do we need to couple decisions for 1.1 and 2.0 in
the same
> > > > > discussion?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Like what? Interface changes for Phoenix maybe?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Sean
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    - Andy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
-
> Piet
> > > > Hein
> > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>

  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message