Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jzhong@hortonworks.com
 designates 209.85.192.179 as permitted sender)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 12:16:12 -0800
Subject: Re: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.2 (RC0) is available.
 Please vote by 12/06/2014
From: Jeffrey Zhong <jzhong@hortonworks.com>
To: <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Message-ID: <D0A8A328.48C98%jzhong@hortonworks.com>
Thread-Topic: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.2 (RC0) is available.
 Please vote by 12/06/2014
References: 
 <CAMUu0w-h4SebHJ3s_4fxeNPfPjsiriGhtOj2zYK06DsHmJzGUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62xM6D2ps=CVfNZu5t9GvqptpXP2uemJmCzq-3PU+511Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGHyZ6J=k0j3PnMsMKqrqXUDHvKzy6tgS2y7gFwrKMhkga59bA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgHWM=NHP-Syx-=KPVZBWtEh2nxWVXTH_pB9FgeQ97NzNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_C+w0sstM8CxzPYGb0xv-zBfCVYO5bpV_xTSU3Xkyf_XA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_DY8L=y+Y4j-Uxo8qDGRsJBajv4ucztDH4WrTu544wtFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMUu0w9LWZt2CmggNx0gRvT+-3nF3GvkUSB+Nw4Oxi-wbj0_Og@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62w9dGwpMxVY2QrN4kgf8SbruU1L5-4n9X-5q9NhV15nGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMUu0w9nuYBNz2ku6fM8PndxmFhHr_HFkdhoNutQzSbxn7+jyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgEgZEK9kJ_7ekDUEOYt8-yC8dikyg3_rWDYe+7dg9wr2Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcMMgEgZEK9kJ_7ekDUEOYt8-yC8dikyg3_rWDYe+7dg9wr2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable


+1 due to it's a dev release.

I've downloaded the RC, run it in pseudo cluster mode and works good. The
issue I hit is when trying to run a integration test and got following
error:=20

	java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DistributedHBaseCluster@dd606a not an instance of
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MiniHBaseCluster

I guess it's fixed by HBASE-12617.


On 12/5/14, 7:26 PM, "Stack" <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

>+1
>
>Verified signature and md5.
>
>Layout looks right (src and bin).
>
>Build it and ran it.  Looks good.
>
>I've been running it the last few days on a cluster doing testing and
>basically works.
>
>St.Ack
>
>On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote=
:
>
>> We need at least one more vote for this.
>>
>> I had set a shorter (4 days) testing window since this is a
>>non-production
>> release. I can extend the voting period if anybody needs it.
>>
>> Enis
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Checked the book
>> > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts
>> > Ran unit test suite - passed.
>> >
>> > Will do some more validation, time permitting.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar <enis@apache.org> w=
rote:
>> >
>> > > Setting aside the Interface discussions, here is my +1 for the RC.
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Downloaded artifacts,
>> > > Checked sigs,
>> > > Checked crcs,
>> > > Checked the book
>> > > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts
>> > > Checked jars of hbase and hadoop in bin artifact
>> > > Checked version strings
>> > > Run in local mode
>> > > Run basic smoke tests in shell
>> > > Run LTT
>> > > Build the src artifact with hadoop versions 2.2.0,2.3.0,2.4.0,
>>2.5.0.
>> > > 2.6.0. Compilation with 2.4.0 and before is broken, but it is ok for
>> > > this RC. See HBASE-12637
>> > > Checked maven repository artifacts by running the hbase-downstreamer
>> > > project test.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Reminder, Sat is the last day to vote on this RC. Please plan to
>>spend
>> > some
>> > > time on the RC so that we can iron out issues for the next 1.0.0RC.
>> > >
>> > > Enis
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Andrew Purtell
>><apurtell@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1501. Pardon the
>> > noise
>> > > > on
>> > > > a VOTE thread.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Purtell
>><apurtell@apache.org
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Phoenix PMC here, although I'm only speaking my own opinion.
>> Concur,
>> > > the
>> > > > > code takes liberties... We need to clean our own house.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sean Busbey
>><busbey@cloudera.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > Compiling Phoenix master against 0.99.2, I got:
>> > > > >> > > http://pastebin.com/gaxCs8fT
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Some removed methods are in HBase classes that are marked
>> > > > >> > > with @InterfaceAudience.Private
>> > > > >> > > I want to get some opinion on whether such methods should
>>be
>> > > > >> deprecated
>> > > > >> > > first.
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> There is no room for 'opinion' in this area. A bunch of work
>>has
>> > been
>> > > > done
>> > > > >> to remove ambiguity around our guarantees. The law as it stands
>> is:
>> > > > >> InterfaceAudience.Private means: "APIs for HBase internals
>> > developers.
>> > > > No
>> > > > >> guarantees on compatibility or availability in future versions.
>> ..."
>> > > > (From
>> > > > >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#code.standards).  We can add
>> > > verbiage
>> > > > >> but
>> > > > >> you would have to have a perverse squint to interpret this "no
>> > > > guarantees"
>> > > > >> as "no guarantees -- after a deprecation cycle".
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> That said, we are an accommodating lot.  I suggest you take the
>> list
>> > > > over
>> > > > >> to phoenix dev and that phoenix comes back with explicit asks
>> rather
>> > > > than
>> > > > >> this blanket list taken from a compile against their master
>> branch.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> As per Sean, this discussion does not belong on a dev release
>>RC
>> > vote
>> > > > >> thread, nor should it hold up its release.
>> > > > >> St.Ack
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > >
>> > > > >    - Andy
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
>>Piet
>> > > Hein
>> > > > > (via Tom White)
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > >
>> > > >    - Andy
>> > > >
>> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
>>Piet
>> > Hein
>> > > > (via Tom White)
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>


--=20
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to=
=20
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,=20
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader=
=20
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that=
=20
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or=20
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have=20
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately=
=20
and delete it from your system. Thank You.