Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEhbsO7tvwKfGZ6-NgK+sEBTnugyxcXJEcup-zQG5X_RXyfhtQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7B4DB9AC-868F-4295-B803-A010BC7B028D@gmail.com>
 <698600159.57686.1418613121848.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10650.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <9BE5CCA9-12C5-4D8C-A7BF-AD55B7266B4B@gmail.com>
 <CAEhbsO7tvwKfGZ6-NgK+sEBTnugyxcXJEcup-zQG5X_RXyfhtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:49:02 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_Cm5nVsZdcZUNXFQAsfqS6eZN4M7zRjJEnU-g=WDjU6Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is available,
 vote closing 12/17/2014
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1e52a283d8050a45b492

--089e013d1e52a283d8050a45b492
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If we can get a patch with a consensus "ok" by the end of today I'll
restart the 0.98.9 RC, otherwise let's put it in .10. It's not a regression
in 0.98.9, but a problem also in earlier releases.

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:42 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla <
chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think Vandana already had working patch it seems. I think she will uplo=
ad
> patch today.
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com=
>
> wrote:
> >
> > My thought is if we have a fix in a day or so a new RC would be good.
> > Otherwise we don't (yet) have a veto, and can decide what to do on the
> > issue.
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 14, 2014, at 7:12 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Unless that is a new issue introduced in a recent 0.98 release, or ca=
n
> > be expected to be fixed in a day or so,
> > > this does not need to hold up the release IMHO.
> > >
> > > -- Lars
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:18 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is
> > available, vote closing 12/17/2014
> > >
> > > Ok, I made HBASE-12686 a blocker for 0.98.9 as requested.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 4:57 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla <
> > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Andrew I got HBASE-12686 in 0.98 branch.
> > >> It will not allow to balance any failures during split. I think we
> need
> > to
> > >> fix it before release.
> > >> What do you say?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Rajeshbabu.
> > >>
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Compiled Phoenix master branch with dependency changed to HBase
> 0.98.9
> > -
> > >>> passed
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Dec 14, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Verified signature.
> > >>>> Ran through test suite against Hadoop-2 : tests passed
> > >>>> Performed 'mvn apache-rat:check' : passed
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8BThe 1st HBase 0.98.9=
 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > >>> download
> > >>>>> at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.9RC0/ and Maven
> artifacts
> > >>> are
> > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository
> > >>>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1049/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D123107=
53&version=3D12328795
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> > >>> (00:00
> > >>>>> -0800 GMT) on =E2=80=8BDecember =E2=80=8B17=E2=80=8B =E2=80=8Bon =
whether or not we should release
> > this
> > >>> as=E2=80=8B
> > >>>>> =E2=80=8B0.98.8. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to rele=
ase.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - Andy
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Pi=
et
> > Hein
> > >>>>> (via Tom White)
> > >>>
> >
>


--=20
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

--089e013d1e52a283d8050a45b492--