Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:24:41 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_BmQ_wtbkhtoVs-26azxhac36yRKZ1KC_1w956_4d9Lug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [CANCELED] [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is
 available, vote closing 12/17/2014
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134583e6d2653050a4f6cb0

--001a1134583e6d2653050a4f6cb0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We're good for a new RC. This vote is canceled.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote=
:
>
> We have one new failing test on branch-1 and master, TestFastFail, in
> failed builds with only HBASE-12348 in common. HBASE-12348 only changes
> AccessController and TestAccessController. I looked at TestFastFail and
> don't see how an AccessController only change can affect it, there are no
> security coprocessors installed for that test (not that I expected any).
> Anyway, since those builds HBASE-12696 has been committed to branch-1 and
> master so I'll wait to see the build reports for those branches
> on HBASE-12696 before proceeding.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> I have pushed HBASE-12686 to 0.98. There was also a branch-1 patch so
>> that went in too. Local tests had a mixed result. TestSplitLogManager is
>> flaky for me on branch-1, but always passes when run on its own, and thi=
s
>> happens with or without the 12686 change. I'm going to wait to see how t=
he
>> branch-1 Jenkins builds look before proceeding with a new 0.98 RC, in ca=
se
>> a revert is necessary. Should be just a few more hours.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If we can get a patch with a consensus "ok" by the end of today I'll
>>> restart the 0.98.9 RC, otherwise let's put it in .10. It's not a regres=
sion
>>> in 0.98.9, but a problem also in earlier releases.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:42 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla <
>>> chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think Vandana already had working patch it seems. I think she will
>>>> upload
>>>> patch today.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Rajeshbabu.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <
>>>> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > My thought is if we have a fix in a day or so a new RC would be good=
.
>>>> > Otherwise we don't (yet) have a veto, and can decide what to do on t=
he
>>>> > issue.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Dec 14, 2014, at 7:12 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Unless that is a new issue introduced in a recent 0.98 release, or
>>>> can
>>>> > be expected to be fixed in a day or so,
>>>> > > this does not need to hold up the release IMHO.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -- Lars
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>>> > > From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
>>>> > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
>>>> > > Cc:
>>>> > > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:18 PM
>>>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) i=
s
>>>> > available, vote closing 12/17/2014
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Ok, I made HBASE-12686 a blocker for 0.98.9 as requested.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 4:57 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla <
>>>> > chrajeshbabu32@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Andrew I got HBASE-12686 in 0.98 branch.
>>>> > >> It will not allow to balance any failures during split. I think w=
e
>>>> need
>>>> > to
>>>> > >> fix it before release.
>>>> > >> What do you say?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Rajeshbabu.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Compiled Phoenix master branch with dependency changed to HBase
>>>> 0.98.9
>>>> > -
>>>> > >>> passed
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Cheers
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>> On Dec 14, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> +1
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Verified signature.
>>>> > >>>> Ran through test suite against Hadoop-2 : tests passed
>>>> > >>>> Performed 'mvn apache-rat:check' : passed
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Cheers
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Andrew Purtell <
>>>> apurtell@apache.org>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8BThe 1st HBase 0.9=
8.9 release candidate (RC0) is available
>>>> for
>>>> > >>> download
>>>> > >>>>> at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.9RC0/ and Maven
>>>> artifacts
>>>> > >>> are
>>>> > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1049=
/
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D123=
10753&version=3D12328795
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacifi=
c
>>>> Time
>>>> > >>> (00:00
>>>> > >>>>> -0800 GMT) on =E2=80=8BDecember =E2=80=8B17=E2=80=8B =E2=80=8B=
on whether or not we should
>>>> release
>>>> > this
>>>> > >>> as=E2=80=8B
>>>> > >>>>> =E2=80=8B0.98.8. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to r=
elease.
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> --
>>>> > >>>>> Best regards,
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> - Andy
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
>>>> Piet
>>>> > Hein
>>>> > >>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>> > >>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>    - Andy
>>>
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hei=
n
>>> (via Tom White)
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>>    - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>


--=20
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

--001a1134583e6d2653050a4f6cb0--