hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A face-lift for 1.0
Date Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:17:03 GMT
I had the same problem. We link to CSS which is http instead of forking and
serving it in the site (I believe this is the default practice). My chrome
extension refuses to connect to http links causing rendering problems.

Enis

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Dima Spivak <dspivak@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Not sure if this is something to address in this thread or if I should file
> a separate JIRA, but for some reason, accessing the site over https gets
> rid of the pretty CSS. Seems to happen in Chrome and Firefox. Anyone have a
> clue why?
>
> -Dima
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tweaking the layout of the website goes one of two ways. Either there's a
> > configuration point exposed from the maven skin or there isn't. If there
> > is, it's simply editing the appropriate custom tag in site.xml. If not,
> > we'll need to bring back the velocity site.vm template. Configurations
> are
> > documented here:
> > http://andriusvelykis.github.io/reflow-maven-skin/skin/config.html
> >
> > Tweaking visuals is now based on the theme. We can either choose another
> > bootswatch theme, or write our own. That stuff is documented here:
> > http://andriusvelykis.github.io/reflow-maven-skin/skin/themes/
> >
> > Right now the site is separate from the book. In theory we could move
> book
> > content over to become site content, in which case it would be managed by
> > this same plugin. Short of that, we get into applying style via the
> docbook
> > plugin. I've looked into this a bit; it's not nearly as easy as applying
> > reflow-maven-skin. The current leads I have for this are
> > https://github.com/lcahlander/docbook and
> >
> >
> https://github.com/pmartin/phing-documentation-docbook/commit/8d8f0b81951c4e07420083b204599a6b9ef00537
> >  .
> >
> > Honestly though, if we're looking at moving away from docbook, I think we
> > should consider a more modern toolset, Sphinx-doc, for example:
> > http://sphinx-doc.org
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Misty Stanley-Jones <
> > mstanleyjones@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Absolutely fantastic!!! Got pointers to how tweaking the website would
> > > work?
> > >
> > > In the new year I hope to really get started on a restructure of the
> Ref
> > > Guide. I've thought about asking to move to AsciiDOC or MarkDown but
> I'd
> > > like to do a proof-of-concept and see if it really gets us anything we
> > > don't already have with Docbook. It's less of a potential value since
> we
> > > are not hosted on Github, which has great integration with AsciiDOC and
> > > MarkDown. I'm very interested in improving the look and feel of the
> doc.
> > I
> > > think a lot of it will be structural -- reorganizing and re-chunking
> > > content.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, theming the Docbook is not as hard as you might think.
> > > Have a look at the XSLT files. (I know, famous last words).
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > For those not following closely in JIRAland, I've two changes that
> are
> > > > ready to go. First, there's transition over to a bootstrap-based
> layout
> > > for
> > > > our home page. This work is done in HBASE-12688. This improves the
> > looks
> > > of
> > > > things and will make it pretty easy to update our look-and-feel in
> the
> > > > future. Second, I fixed a build problem where the online book wasn't
> > > > getting its intended styling. This is done in HBASE-12687. I'd like
> to
> > > > update the book to look the same as the front-page, but getting
> styles
> > > into
> > > > docbook is proving non-trivial.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, both of these changes are pushed to master and we're ready
> for
> > a
> > > > site re-build with the new look. I'll make that happen tomorrow
> morning
> > > > unless I hear actionable objections.
> > > >
> > > > You can get a preview of things to come over one
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/site/
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Nick
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks. I've been having a dialog w/ your crew that has been going
> > on a
> > > > > while... was wondering if any progress.
> > > > > Grand,
> > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm checking to see if our marketing and web team can help.
 The
> > > > > > primary requirement is going to be ditching the mvn:site from
the
> > > > > > front page.  "reskinning it" might not be so easy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -ryan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > I just came across one of the various HBase vs. Cassandra
> > articles,
> > > > and
> > > > > > one of the main tenants of the articles was how much better
the
> > > > Cassandra
> > > > > > documentation was.Thank god we have Misty now. :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (not sure how much just a skin would help, but it surely
won't
> > > hurt)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Lars
> > > > > > >       From: Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >  To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > > > > > >  Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:46 AM
> > > > > > >  Subject: A face-lift for 1.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Heya,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In mind of the new release, I was thinking we should clean
up
> our
> > > > act a
> > > > > > > little bit in regard to hbase.apache.org and our book.
Just
> > > because
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > project started in 2007 doesn't mean we need a site that
looks
> > like
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > > from 2007. Phoenix's site looks great in this regard.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the home page, I was thinking of converting it over
to
> > > bootstrap
> > > > > [0]
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > > that it'll be easier to pick up theme, either on of our
own or
> > > > > something
> > > > > > > pre-canned [1]. I'm no web designer, but the idea is this
would
> > > make
> > > > it
> > > > > > > easier for someone who is to help us out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the book, I just want to skin it -- no intention of
> changing
> > > > > docbook
> > > > > > > part (such a decision I'll leave up to Misty). I'm less
sure on
> > > this
> > > > > > > project, but Riak's docs are a nice inspiration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you think? Do we know any web designers who can
help
> out
> > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > CSS?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -n
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [0]: http://getbootstrap.com
> > > > > > > [1]: https://wrapbootstrap.com/
> > > > > > > [2]: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message