hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francis Christopher Liu <toffer....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: NumTables/regions Quota management and RS groups - Core or coprocessors
Date Fri, 05 Dec 2014 21:35:08 GMT
Thanks for the response guys. Can I take it this is an affirmative for
region server groups as well? HBASE-6721


-Francis

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> bq. something like quotas is a core issue
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > ​In my opinion something like quotas is a core issue. It might be nice to
> > allow coprocessors to hook in, but that's a secondary consideration.​
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We were chatting with Francis offline about these two features, which
> are
> > > both related to NS and multi-tenant deployments.
> > >
> > > The issue came up regarding whether these belong to core or they should
> > be
> > > left as coprocessor based implementations.
> > >
> > > From a users perspective, if we leave these as co-processors, I feel
> that
> > > they won't be used much and unless a very specific reason, most of the
> > > users will not make use of them. However, especially for quotas for
> > > example, I think that they should be enabled by default, and with some
> > > reasonable default values (similar to how linux comes with default
> ulimit
> > > settings).
> > >
> > > We just wanted to bring this to dev to see what do you guys think.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8410
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message