hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.1 (RC0) is available. Please vote by 10/15/2014
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2014 01:01:27 GMT
+1

Downloaded
Checked sig.
Checked tar layout.
Checked running locally.

lgtm for a dev release.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:

> Can we get one more +1 of this please.
>
> If so, I will continue with the releasing the bits tomorrow.
> Thanks,
> Enis
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Downloaded artifacts,
> > Checked sigs,
> > Checked crcs,
> > Checked the book
> > Checked dir layout in bin and src artifacts
> > Checked jars of hbase and hadoop in bin artifact
> > Build the src artifact with hadoop versions 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 (*)
> > Checked version strings
> > Run in local mode
> > Run basic smoke tests in shell
> > Run LTT
> > Checked maven repository artifacts by running the hbase-downstreamer
> > project test.
> >
> >
> > (*) This RC does not build with hadoop versions before 2.4.0 as reported
> > in HBASE-12246. We've decided that it is not a sinker (see the thread).
> >
> > Enis
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Since this is a dev release, lets not sink the RC, but document it here.
> >> However, in 1.0 we should keep 2.4- compilation (thus raising
> HBASE-12246
> >> as a blocker) .
> >>
> >> Enis
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > It seems we've broken the compilation with h2.2.x and 2.3.x:
> >>> >
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12246
> >>> >
> >>> > Our hadoop compatibility matrix currently states that we are
> >>> compatible,
> >>> > but earlier versions are not tested as much. Still might be enough
to
> >>> sink
> >>> > the RC.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> If branch-1 must work with hadoops before 2.4, I'll just revert the
> >>> addition of hedged read tracing from branch-1.
> >>>
> >>> Would suggest this not enough to sink a dev release. Could just note
> its
> >>> broke for -2.4.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Enis,
> >>>
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message