hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
Subject Re: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for download
Date Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:06:37 GMT
Probably. I think it's more important to the default settings, though, in order to make sure
that we haven't regressed.
There's nothing in this release that would suggest a negative impact, so we should be good.



________________________________
 From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org> 
Cc: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> 
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for download
 


Got it! So I will re-run a randomWrite (to populate the table) and a randomRead with 64 bytes
cells. Should that show the difference between the 2?



2014-10-02 13:25 GMT-04:00 Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodionov@gmail.com>:



Any read/scan  from block cache test should show some improvement with
>small KVs (1Kb is large).
>
>-Vladimir Rodionov
>
>
>On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> What is the exact use-case where I should see improvement? I can add it in
>> my test script and re-run that part on 0.94.23 to compare.
>>
>> So 1k KVs, but most on the reads? On the writes? On scanning? Skipping?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> JM
>>
>> 2014-10-02 12:43 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>:
>>
>> > Thanks JM.
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking forward to some perf numbers. 0.94.24 should have a bunch of
>> > improvements. (Although PE will probably not show them as it operates on
>> 1k
>> > KVs, and so perf is dominated by moving the KVs around.)
>> >
>> > -- Lars
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
>> > To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
>> > Cc: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:35 PM
>> > Subject: Re: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for
>> > download
>> >
>> > Downloaded, uncompressed, signature checked => Passed
>> > Checked files (.TXT) and doc => Broken linkes in README.txt and 2.3.1 is
>> > malformated.
>> > Started standalone, checked logs and UI => Passed.
>> >
>> > Test suite JDK1.7 => Passed  twice, failed once:
>> > Failed tests:
>> >
>> >
>> testExceptionFromCoprocessorDuringPut(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionServerCoprocessorExceptionWithAbort):
>> > The put should have failed, as the coprocessor is buggy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> testMultiRowMutationMultiThreads(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestAtomicOperation):
>> > expected:<0> but was:<1>
>> >
>> > Test suite JDK1.6 => Passed twice in a row.
>> > Create table, scan, put, get, disable, drop => Passed.
>> >
>> > Looks good to me too. +1
>> >
>> > Perfs tests are running, I will report tomorrow or Friday.
>> >
>> > JM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-10-01 19:41 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Verified signtaure.
>> > > Ran test suite - TestSnapshotFromMaster#testSnapshotHFileArchiving
>> failed
>> > > but passed when run alone.
>> > > Done some random shell ops.
>> > > All looks good
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1 from me
>> > > >
>> > > > - Installed the binary release.
>> > > > - checked signature
>> > > > - checked docs, etc
>> > > > - inserted some data
>> > > > - flushed, compacted, scanned, etc, all good
>> > > > - nothing strange in the log*
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > * I did find a message logged where we apparently do not escape
>> binary
>> > > > data correctly. That's not a new problem, though. Logged HBASE-12146
>> > for
>> > > > that.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Please do not forget to vote for the release. Only two days left.
:)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -- Lars
>> > > >
>> > > > ________________________________
>> > > > From: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>> > > > To: Dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
>> > > > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:03 PM
>> > > > Subject: The 3rd hbase 0.94.24 release candidate is available for
>> > > download
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The 3rd (and hopefully last) 0.94.24 RC is available for download
at
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.24-rc2/
>> > > > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>> > > >
>> > > > HBase 0.94.24 is a bug fix release with 13 fixes:
>> > > >     [HBASE-11923] - Potential race condition in
>> > > > RecoverableZookeeper.checkZk()
>> > > >     [HBASE-11963] - Synchronize peer cluster replication connection
>> > > > attempts
>> > > >     [HBASE-12023] - HRegion.applyFamilyMapToMemstore creates too many
>> > > > iterator objects.
>> > > >     [HBASE-12077] - FilterLists create many ArrayList$Itr objects
per
>> > > row.
>> > > >     [HBASE-11405] - Multiple invocations of hbck in parallel disables
>> > > > balancer permanently
>> > > >     [HBASE-11957] - Backport to 0.94 HBASE-5974 Scanner retry
>> behavior
>> > > > with RPC timeout on next() seems incorrect
>> > > >     [HBASE-12019] - hbase-daemon.sh overwrite HBASE_ROOT_LOGGER and
>> > > > HBASE_SECURITY_LOGGER variables
>> > > >     [HBASE-12020] - String formatting on each RPC Invoke
>> > > >     [HBASE-12022] - Payloads on Failure attempt to serialize the
>> byte[]
>> > > > into strings.
>> > > >     [HBASE-12114] - Meta table cache hashing may access the wrong
>> table
>> > > >     [HBASE-12090] - Bytes: more Unsafe, more Faster
>> > > >     [HBASE-12103] - Backport HFileV1Detector to 0.94
>> > > >     [HBASE-12113] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-5525 Truncate and
>> preserve
>> > > > region boundaries option
>> > > >
>> > > > The list of changes is also available here:
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12327569
>> > > >
>> > > > Here's the test run for this RC:
>> > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.24/43/
>> > > >
>> > > > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc,
>> and
>> > > > vote +1/-1 by EOD October 3rd on whether we should release this as
>> > > 0.94.24.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks.
>> > > >
>> > > > -- Lars
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message