Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMUu0w_rS5kO3N2RtPRD00DpSfat4yuTE93efJRCaPBnQ5hGuw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMUu0w94oARqcz2zY4ZLqy_AaqN70whhH1yCS_0BjPSEeEcM-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgFHVwWq2X-COP0O6DbUL7uGHty7fEm+pskaxu5CEr_rcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63V-cmzTm6p5zV=pnv+dbHa-sN7DBDK=7DtgiyA9xoJOnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMUu0w_rS5kO3N2RtPRD00DpSfat4yuTE93efJRCaPBnQ5hGuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:28:03 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAPQV63X3j8V+gd+JNv_RXQdTR9zRdw2h5rwuF350XHeU-+aLgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.0 (RC0) is available.
 Please vote by 09/17/2014
To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c247e466f3130502d2867b

--001a11c247e466f3130502d2867b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sound like I'm the specialist to get TimeOuts on the tests ;) Got them on
0.98 too ;)

I will send that shortly.

JM

2014-09-11 14:11 GMT-04:00 Enis S=C3=B6ztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > Exciting to see 0.99 (and so 1.0) coming soon!
> >
>
> Yay!
>
>
> >
> > I'm running a lot of tests for this release like for any other, but jus=
t
> to
> > report that so far, mvn test fails about 70% of the time time on a time
> out
> > on TestByteBufferIOEngine. Am I the only one to face that?
> >
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0/ is blue for some time. =
I
> did not see that test failing recently. What does the log say?
>
>
> >
> > JM
> >
> > 2014-09-11 13:02 GMT-04:00 Stack <stack@duboce.net>:
> >
> > > Thanks for doing the helpful writeup Enis. It helps doing evaluation.
> > >
> > > I have one question below.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar <enis@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Starting with 0.99.0, the HBase master server and backup master
> servers
> > > > will
> > > > also act as a region server. RPC port and info port for web UI is
> > shared
> > > > for
> > > > the master and region server roles. Active master will be hosting t=
he
> > > meta
> > > > table (and other hbase system tables, acl and namespace) by default
> > > > (unless configured otherwise). The master and backup masters will n=
ot
> > be
> > > > hosting user level regions. See HBASE-10569 and HBASE-11604 for mor=
e
> > > > details.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think we should change this so this is NOT the default in 1.0. What
> do
> > > folks think?  The new deploy topology will surprise going from earlie=
r
> > > version. Better folks enable it explicitly*?
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > * I used to be in favor of this feature being on by default but I hav=
e
> > > since changed my mind given how I see meta hosting evolving in the
> > > near-future.
> > >
> >
>

--001a11c247e466f3130502d2867b--