Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 752A211FCA for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 21:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71397 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2014 21:25:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 71313 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2014 21:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 71301 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2014 21:25:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:25:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of enis.soz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.178] (HELO mail-yk0-f178.google.com) (209.85.160.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:25:16 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 20so380548yks.37 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:24:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=GtlQ8bjwJ60SxpXvruU+s70uhRnESvS9CkzC8L8SXwU=; b=I0MiVxRyv1g0wlS1GZHY0KqUmvk0HT7mgLMrU2goDDbSWCiU+MMog1V/1FbTaLc84o daSPRIXX8FN+xY1uzDb8X/QoZes6HPDNhHhYcSlvvbCGcbSY1IRSyuiFzBvLRzZ+Ybu2 jAoWC2LW8ARIvaLsr1rE7JU9Hu2b1gU6iD+/YvQXRStqiWsgGOOYnX5dx0XlLDFO+fOE kgiNPr/DZIu89UuSpjxL4qgjvkgCczvuVcbWYqY+xS1NAYN6cJ6Xsbap15NkMHwkRFOb 7aZEfKzhEORjCf0gqblTDQ2PacjSDgvxonlCM+DffSIbKuNpMSFksVxJHIxwGML5wvt+ w47Q== X-Received: by 10.236.191.166 with SMTP id g26mr45416010yhn.30.1410211495477; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:24:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.207.72 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:24:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Enis_S=C3=B6ztutar?= Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:24:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Doing some testing of branch-1 and want to know what replica messages mean? To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30563e8b3f073805029473b8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf30563e8b3f073805029473b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This maybe from recent changes from Nicolas in the client side. Yeah, we should not be logging at the INFO level. Enis On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Stack wrote: > There is a load of this stuff too at INFO level on client-side: > > 2014-09-08 11:24:27,533 INFO [htable-pool25-t1] client.AsyncProcess: #129, > table=TestTable, attempt=2/35 failed 224 ops, last exception: > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: Region > > TestTable,00000000000000000000283916,1410199679935.3fc14391d0ecfdb59950c62e76367cc4. > is not online on c2021.halxg.cloudera.com,16020,1410200244722 > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer.getRegionByEncodedName(HRegionServer.java:2605) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.getRegion(RSRpcServices.java:796) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:1711) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:30090) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2014) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:108) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor.consumerLoop(RpcExecutor.java:114) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$1.run(RpcExecutor.java:94) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) > > Seeing exceptions in your log will disorientate (The NSRE looks like it has > no associated 'message' on the client-side). > > Anyone looking into fixing these? > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Stack wrote: > > > I'm doing some basic testing of branch-1 to see if can catch any ugly > > stuff before we cut our first 0.99. > > > > Can someone help me w/ following debug-level messages: > > > > 2014-09-08 11:24:13,739 DEBUG [TestClient-43] > > client.ScannerCallableWithReplicas: Setting current scanner as -1 > > associated with 0 > > 2014-09-08 11:24:13,739 DEBUG [TestClient-76] > > client.ScannerCallableWithReplicas: Setting current scanner as -1 > > associated with 0 > > 2014-09-08 11:24:13,739 DEBUG [TestClient-93] > > client.ScannerCallableWithReplicas: Setting current scanner as -1 > > associated with 0 > > 2014-09-08 11:24:13,748 DEBUG [TestClient-10] > > client.ScannerCallableWithReplicas: Setting current scanner as -1 > > associated with 0 > > > > The -1 is the scanner id it seems but I'd think a -1 id is 'bad'... least > > that is what I think when I see it. I'm at DEBUG level so not so bad but > > there is a lot of replica logging going on. Should this logging be > > switched? i.e. only log when we are doing replicas? Is there a config. > to > > check? > > > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > > > > > > --20cf30563e8b3f073805029473b8--