Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPQV63Uo_+zvw12DNB_QKMhk+nqHutfe0HJ+AJTP4WYm8Xu6eA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_DVZ1jhvf+D_siJ+sUdvPvCb1BQvHw5R8UGmt73DMbxEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUu0w-zLp_8MPXU4qYY+E8_WiVmpqX0e+H3f_7XLc=5g7uO2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62zGesrKD2-2N-9Bf16JSU9cmDThJ1vAJCLVH7Dm4G-ZPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPQV63Uo_+zvw12DNB_QKMhk+nqHutfe0HJ+AJTP4WYm8Xu6eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:47:24 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62xhobRHf0CKuqGySJ45p-pJt_yDsPNagQbPEzFnvosy6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
 available, vote closing 9/16
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301b606fe03989050324ee4c

--20cf301b606fe03989050324ee4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Unit test suite passed.

+1 from me.

[INFO] HBase - Integration Tests ......................... SUCCESS [0.964s]
[INFO] HBase - Examples .................................. SUCCESS [5.818s]
[INFO] HBase - Assembly .................................. SUCCESS [0.857s]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 1:00:00.281s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Sep 16 01:39:03 UTC 2014
[INFO] Final Memory: 47M/458M

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:

> Did not get those errors on my side for the binaries:
> jms@t430s:/tmp$ tar -xzf hbase-0.98.6.1-hadoop2-bin.tar.gz
> jms@t430s:/tmp$
>
> But got that on the src too. However, as you said, content seems to be
> fine.
>
> I still think we should fix that.
>
> 2014-09-15 21:35 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>:
>
> > I saw that too.
> >
> > Agree it is not a blocker.
> >
> > Unit test suite is running.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com=
>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
> > >
> > > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
> > >
> > > ....
> > >
> > > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> > > > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> > > > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> > > > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> > > > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I hav=
e
> > > > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> > > > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> > > > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> > > > should be straightforward to assess.
> > > >
> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available f=
or
> > > > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and
> Maven
> > > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> > > >
> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > >
> > > > The issues resolved in this release are:
> > > >
> > > >     HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection
> > attempts
> > > >         https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> > > >
> > > >     HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl tab=
le
> > > > RPC is incorrect
> > > >         https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> > > >
> > > > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch
> release,
> > > > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > > Hein (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--20cf301b606fe03989050324ee4c--